Jerome Powell’s Fed Notches an Historic Record of $204 Billion in Cumulative Operating Losses – Losing Over $1 Billion a Week for More than Two Years

by Pam Martens and Russ Martens, Wall St On Parade:

According to its own FRED data, the last time the central bank of the United States – the Federal Reserve – operated in the green was September 14, 2022, more than two years ago. Since then, it has been consistently losing over $1 billion a week with its cumulative operating losses now topping $204 billion as of the last reporting by the Fed on October 16, 2024.

Operating losses of this magnitude are unprecedented at the of Fed, which was created in 1913.

TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/

Fed Operating Losses Total a Cumulative $204 Billion

If a publicly-traded company had been bleeding operating losses of more than $1 billion a week for more than two years, there would very likely be a change of leadership at the top. But Fed Chair Jerome Powell is no ordinary mortal. He survived the worst trading scandal in the Fed’s history – even after his own trading conduct came into question.

These losses at the Fed are operating losses – where expenses exceed earnings. They are not to be confused with the unrealized losses on the Fed’s underwater debt securities that the Fed holds on its balance sheet, which it does not mark to market.

The Fed is experiencing these operating losses because the interest it is earning on its $6.6 trillion portfolio of debt securities that it acquired through its Quantitative Easing (QE) operations is less than the overly generous interest payments it is making to banks. These payments include the 4.90 percent interest the Fed is paying to the megabanks on Wall Street (and other Fed member banks) for the reserves they hold with the Fed. This morning, the yield on the benchmark 10-year U.S. Treasury note is just 4.13 percent. That yield hasn’t climbed above 4.50 percent for more than four months. So why is the Fed continuing to pay out the overly generous rate of 4.90 percent interest on reserves to the banks it supervises when it’s bleeding losses?

Is the Fed blatantly subsidizing bank profits while some of these same megabanks charge double digit interest rates to consumers on their credit cards? (See, for example: While JPMorgan Chase Was Getting Trillions of Dollars in Loans at Almost Zero Percent Interest from the Fed, It Was Charging Americans Hit by the Pandemic 17 Percent on their Credit Cards.)

The Fed is also paying out the overly generous rate of 4.80 percent on its reverse repo operations with giant mutual fund companies – many of which are owned by the megabanks on Wall Street. And, the Fed is paying a ridiculous 6 percent dividend to member shareholder banks with assets of $10 billion or less. Banks with assets above $10 billion receive the lesser of 6 percent or the yield on the 10-year Treasury note at the most recent auction prior to the dividend payment.

U.S. taxpayers have good reason to be alarmed by the Fed’s ongoing operating losses. That’s because when the Fed is operating in the green, the Fed, by law, turns over excess earnings to the U.S. Treasury – thus reducing the amount the U.S. government has to borrow by issuing Treasury debt securities. According to Fed data, between 2011 and 2021, the Fed’s excess earnings paid to the U.S. Treasury totaled more than $920 billion.

The loss of remittances from the Fed means that the U.S. government will go deeper into debt, putting a heavier tax burden on the U.S. taxpayer and raising the risk of another credit rating agency downgrade of U.S. sovereign debt.

Another problem at the Fed is that instead of being a beacon for pristine accounting practices, it is engaging in creative accounting according to experts. A January 31 paper by Paul H. Kupiec and Alex J. Pollock published by the American Enterprise Institute explains in stark detail why the Fed has negative capital under GAAP accounting. The researchers write:

Read More @ WallStOnParade.com


Originally Posted at https://www.sgtreport.com


Stay Updated with news.freeptomaineradio.com’s Daily Newsletter

Stay informed! Subscribe to our daily newsletter to receive updates on our latest blog posts directly in your inbox. Don’t let important information get buried by big tech.





Current subscribers:

  • Related Posts

    Hurricane Rafael Public Advisory Number 13A

    …CENTER OF RAFAEL MOVING OVER THE SOUTHEASTERN GULF OF MEXICO…
    …8 PM EST POSITION UPDATE…
    Location: 23.3°N 83.3°W
    Max sustained: 105 mph
    Moving: NW at 14 mph
    Min pressure: 968 mb

    Issued at 700 PM EST Wed Nov 06 2024

    Dave Smith: Will Trump Be Able To End The War In Ukraine?

    Dave Smith: Will Trump Be Able To End The War In Ukraine?

    At a recent pre-election speaking and podcast event, comedian and Libertarian political commentator Dave Smith expressed his view that it is very realistic that the next President Donald Trump could successfully negotiate an end to the Ukraine war

    Smith’s view is optimistic, as he articulated that he believes Trump’s expressed desire to end wars in Ukraine and Gaza is genuine. But Smith also laid out that much depends on who Trump puts around him in top national security positions. Below is the hard-hitting segment featuring the prominent commentator addressing the question: will Trump be able to end the war in Ukraine?

    Below are Dave Smith’s words from the segment on Trump and Ukraine below [emphasis ZH]…

    “Why the hell are we even expanding our military alliance to Ukraine? And listen, Donald Trump always says that the war ‘never would have happened if I was president, and I would negotiate an end to this.’

    And I gotta say I think he’s right about that. I don’t think the war would have happened if he was president – I think he will negotiate an end to it.

    I don’t think he’s right that Hamas wouldn’t have attacked Israel if he was president – that seems kind of ridiculous to me. But he’s right: the Ukraine war could be over tomorrow if American wanted to negotiated a peace to it.

    Vladimir Putin has been trying to the entire time… 

    Well the question becomes who does Donald Trump put around him? If Donald Trump puts Mike Pompeo, aka Liz Cheney’s pick for Defense Secretary… if he puts John Bolton, aka Hillary Clinton’s pick for national security adviser – then maybe not, maybe it doesn’t happen.

    But if he listens to Tucker Carlson, and ‘Bobby’ Kennedy, and Vivek Ramaswamy, and all the smart people around him – then yes, he could negotiate an end to that war.”

    Image source: Reason

    * * *

    Indeed, the question ultimately becomes: will Trump really keep the ‘swamp’ out of his administration this time around? We hope so.

    Tyler Durden
    Wed, 11/06/2024 – 18:00

    You Missed

    Hurricane Rafael Public Advisory Number 13A

    • By NHC
    • November 6, 2024
    • 2 views

    Dave Smith: Will Trump Be Able To End The War In Ukraine?

    Dave Smith: Will Trump Be Able To End The War In Ukraine?

    Hurricane Rafael Public Advisory

    • By NHC
    • November 6, 2024
    • 2 views

    Netanyahu Fires Defense Minister Gallant; Set to Fire Military Chiefs

    Netanyahu Fires Defense Minister Gallant; Set to Fire Military Chiefs

    Iranian currency falls to historic low after Donald Trump named next president of the United States

    Iranian currency falls to historic low after Donald Trump named next president of the United States

    The View Goes FULL Meltdown: Disney’s TDS Election Response Is UNHINGED – But Joy Behar Subdued!

    • By WDWPro
    • November 6, 2024
    • 2 views
    The View Goes FULL Meltdown: Disney’s TDS Election Response Is UNHINGED – But Joy Behar Subdued!