By B.N. Frank
A group of telecom experts who call themselves The Irregulators have proven that all Americans have already paid for access to safer and more secure high-speed broadband through hardwired connections (see 1, 2) rather than unsafe and less secure biologically and environmental harmful Wi-Fi and 5G. Despite this, as well as increasing American opposition to wireless and 5G deployment (see 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22), the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) continues to endorse and fund wireless and 5G deployment anyway (see 1, 2, 3, 4) while simultaneously ignoring an almost two-year-old federal court ruling in favor of petitioners who sued the agency for NOT updating wireless radiation exposure guidelines (including 5G) since 1996 (see 1, 2). Of course lawmakers have been supporting reckless wireless and 5G deployment as well, including with a new bill that could actually worsen the “Digital Divide.” Groups currently crying foul on this bill now include the U.S. Conference of Mayors.
From Inside Towers:
Mayors Oppose a Bill to Speed Broadband Permitting
UPDATE Inside Towers reported the House Energy and Commerce Committee recently sent to the full House a measure to speed how long state and local governments can take to approve or reject broadband infrastructure permits. The U.S. Conference of Mayors says it limits the rights of localities.
The bill proposes using a 60-to-90-day shot clock. If that runs out, the permits would be deemed granted. The measure comes as NTIA prepares to allocate $42.5 billion in the Infrastructure Law to build broadband nationwide. Telecom providers told lawmakers that lengthy permit delays cost them time and money.
Bill supporters say the measure would ensure that broadband projects won’t get slowed down by bureaucratic red tape. A shot clock “would streamline the process” and create “clear rules of the road for when these timeframes begin and end,” said the bill sponsor, Rep. Buddy Carter (R-GA).
Ranking Member Rep. Frank Pallone (D-NJ), argued that a lack of staff “particularly in smaller towns and counties” could have a hard time meeting the bill’s “arbitrary” and “tight” deadlines. “There is a lot more to these decisions than a simple yes or no,” said Pallone.
The U.S. Conference of Mayors says that by going over their heads to approve permits based on an arbitrary timeline, the federal government would be preempting local governments’ ability to control night work or if and when roads are closed. The mayors also argued that the bill would weaken cities’ leverage to push companies to provide service in poor communities, according to Route Fifty. It “would bestow on broadband providers an unprecedented federal grant of access to state and local public property, but impose no obligations on those providers to serve ‘unserved’ and ‘underserved’ Americans,” said the group in a resolution.
Under the proposal, state and local governments would have 90 days to reject applications by cable companies to construct fiber projects that are underground or on a public right-of-way. The deadline is tighter for wireless projects, giving governments only 60 days if it involves using an existing structure. In both cases, some projects are given more time depending on circumstances.
But Gerard Lederer, a telecom consultant who works with the U.S. Conference of Mayors, notes that the federal government has 270 days to approve broadband permits. “Think there’s a fundamental equity issue there?” he asked Route Fifty rhetorically.
The changes would help smaller companies build broadband in rural areas, according to Michael Romano, executive vice president of NTCA – The Rural Broadband Association. “Where we really run into the biggest issues are federal lands and across state highways,” he said. “Having a degree of uniformity to the calculation of fees and the processes for applications is going to be huge, especially for a small company.”
By Leslie Stimson, Inside Towers Washington Bureau Chief
Activist Post reports regularly about government corruption and unsafe technologies. For more information, visit our archives and the following websites:
Originally Posted at www.activistpost.com
closing question, who do you Support for U.S. President in 2024 please take our poll and let us know at this LINK