The following are excerpts from Dr. Nass’ report titled ‘The WHO’s Pandemic Treaty Will Increase Man-Made Pandemics’.  We encourage you to read the full report HERE.  Dr. Nass had previously published a shorter version of this report on Brownstone Institute which you can read HERE. And, in a recent podcast, she discussed it with Sasha Latypova.  You can watch the podcast HERE.

Weapons of Mass Destruction: Chemical/Biological

Weapons of Mass Destruction (“WMD”) have been labelled Chemical, Biological, Radiologic, and Nuclear (“CBRN”).  They are cheap ways to kill and maim large numbers of people quickly.

To prevent their development and use, international treaties were created.  The first was the Geneva Protocol of 1925, banning the use of biological and chemical weapons in war.  Many nations signed it, but it took 50 years for the USA to ratify it, and during those 50 years, the US asserted it was not bound by the treaty.  The US used both biological and chemical weapons during those 50 years.

President Nixon announced to the world in November 1969 that the US was going to end its biowarfare program – but not the chemical program. In February 1970 Nixon announced we would also get rid of the USA’s toxin weapons, which included snake, snail, frog, fish, bacterial and fungal toxins that could be used for assassinations and other purposes.

Nixon told the world that the US would initiate an international treaty to prevent the use of these weapons ever again.  In 1975, the Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production and Stockpiling of Bacteriological (Biological) and Toxin Weapons and on their Destruction, or Biological Weapons Convention (“BWC”) for short, entered into force.

But in 1973, Americans Herbert Boyer and Stanley Cohen discovered genetic engineering (recombinant DNA).  This discovery changed the biological warfare calculus.

It has taken over 40 years, but in 2022 all declared stocks of chemical weapons were destroyed by the USA, Russia, and the other 193 member nation signatories.

It is now 2023, and during the 48 years the Biological Weapons Convention has been in force the wall it was supposed to build against the development, production, and use of biological weapons has been steadily eroded.

Under the guise of preparing their defences against biowarfare and pandemics, nations have conducted “dual-use” – both offensive and defensive – research and development, which has led to the creation of more deadly and more transmissible microorganisms. And, employing new verbiage to shield this effort from scrutiny, biological warfare research was renamed as “gain-of-function” research.

How Would You Create a Biological Warfare Agent?

Gain-of-function (“GoF”) is so risky that funding it was banned by the US government – but only for SARS coronaviruses and avian flu viruses – in 2014 after a public outcry from hundreds of scientists. Then in 2017 Drs. Tony Fauci and Francis Collins lifted the moratorium, with no real safeguards in place.

GoF means that scientists are able to use a variety of techniques to turn ordinary or pathogenic viruses and bacteria into biological weapons. The functions gained by the viruses or other microorganisms to turn them into biological warfare agents consist of two categories: enhanced transmission or enhanced pathogenicity (illness severity).

Funding for (Natural) Pandemics, Including Yearly Influenza, was Lumped Together with Biological Defence Funding

Perhaps the co-mingling of funding was designed to make it harder for Congress and the public to understand what was being funded, and how much taxpayer funding was going to GoF work?

Non-profits and universities – like EcoHealth Alliance and its affiliation with Professor Jonna Mazet at the University of California, Davis Veterinary School – were used as intermediaries to obscure the fact that US taxpayers were supporting scientists in dozens of foreign countries, including China, for research that included GoF work on coronaviruses.

Understanding the huge sums involved might have led Americans to question why this research was being done at all.  And, perhaps to keep the lucrative funding going, fears about pandemics have been deliberately amplified over the past several decades. We have been assaulted with warnings and threats for over 2 decades to induce a deep fear of infectious diseases. It seems to have worked.

The genomes of both SARS-CoV-2 and the 2022 monkeypox, or Mpox, virus led to suspicions that both were bioengineered pathogens originating in laboratories.

Maiming with Myocarditis

Both of the two US monkeypox/smallpox vaccines (Jynneos and ACAM2000) are known to cause myocarditis, as do all 3 covid vaccines currently available in the US:  the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA vaccines and the Novavax vaccine.

If you use elevated cardiac enzymes as your marker, ACAM2000 caused myocarditis in 1 in 30 people receiving it for the first time. If you use other measures like abnormal cardiac MRI or echo, according to the CDC it occurs in 1 in 175 vaccinees.

“I have not seen a study with rates of myocarditis for Jynneos, but there was an unspecified elevation of cardiac enzymes in 10 per cent and 18 per cent of Jynneos recipients in two unpublished prelicensure studies available on the FDA website,”  Dr. Nass wrote.

“My guess for the mRNA covid vaccines is that they cause myocarditis in this general range (between 1 in 10 and 1 in 250 recipients per dose), while the vast majority of cases are probably asymptomatic and never diagnosed,” she said.

Covid Vaccines: The Chicken or the Egg?

Assuming they were ignorant before, once health authorities figured out and even announced in August 2021 that the vaccines did not prevent catching covid or transmitting it, why did our health authorities still not only encourage but mandate covid vaccines on low-risk populations who were clearly at greater risk from vaccine side effects than from covid? And why did they double down on mandates as time went on and newer variants were less and less virulent?

Once you acknowledge these basic facts, you realise that maybe the vaccines were not made for the pandemic, and instead, the pandemic was made to roll out the vaccines. While we cannot be certain, we should at least be suspicious.

A Pandemic Treaty and Amendments:  Brought to You by the Same People Who Mismanaged the Past 3 Years, to Save Us from Themselves?

WHO and the governments that imposed draconian measures on citizens to force us to be vaccinated; take dangerous, expensive, experimental drugs; withheld effective treatments; refused to tell us that most people who required ICU care for covid were vitamin D-deficient; and, never said that taking vitamin D would lessen covid’s severity – decided in 2021 we suddenly needed an international pandemic treaty.  Why?  To prevent and ameliorate future pandemics or biological warfare events … so we would not suffer again as we did with the covid pandemic, they insisted. The WHO would manage it.

To paraphrase Ronald Reagan, the words, “I’m from the WHO, and I’m here to help” should be the most terrifying words in the English language, after what we learned from the covid fiasco.

How can anyone take seriously claims by the same officials who mishandled covid that they want to spare us from another medical and economic disaster–by employing the same strategies they applied to covid after they masterminded the last disaster?

Originally Posted at