Breitbart Business Digest: Why We Don't Feel We Are Better Off Than Four Years Ago
Business Economics Entertainment Gossip News Politics Sports War

Breitbart Business Digest: Why We Don’t Feel We Are Better Off Than Four Years Ago

Why Harris Dodged the Most Important Question of the Debate

The most important moment of the presidential debate this week took place at the very start.

ABC News debate moderator David Muir asked what might have been the most predictable question of the night: Are Americans better off than they were four years ago?

This is a classic question that any incumbent candidate should expect to be asked. It’s an especially salient question now because polls show that many Americans are deeply unhappy with economic conditions and believe their own financial condition is deteriorating.

Ronald Reagan used the question to devastating effect against incumbent President Jimmy Carter in the 1980 debate.

“Are you better off than you were four years ago? Is it easier for you to go buy things in the stores than it was four years ago?” Reagan asked.

The question on Tuesday night did not come from Donald Trump but from the moderator.

“Vice President Harris, you and President Trump [sic] were elected four years ago and your opponent on the stage here tonight often asks his supporters, are you better off than you were four years ago? When it comes to the economy, do you believe Americans are better off than they were four years ago?” Muir asked.

We will not burden you with quoting Harris’s answer. If you’d like, you can read it in the ABC News transcript. It begins with her talking about her biography (“I was raised as a middle-class kid”) and ends with the false claim that the tariffs proposed by Trump would amount to a national sales tax. What it does not do is attempt to address the question at all.

That’s quite extraordinary. Certainly, the advisers to Harris would have prepared her for this question, either from the moderators or Trump himself. How is it she could not provide an answer?

The Problem for Harris Is That We’re Worse Off Than We Were Under Trump

The most charitable answer would be that the Harris campaign decided that avoiding the question was preferable to answering it because any honest answer would require admitting that in many ways the America people are worse off than they were. And the central cause of many of the economic woes of voters is inflation.

Start with household income. If it weren’t for inflation, the last few years would look terrific for our incomes. Median household income rose from $68,700 in 2019 and $68,100 in 2020 to $70,780 in Biden’s first year in office. The following year it climbed to $74,580. Last year, it jumped again to $80, 610. (Obviously, this year’s numbers are not yet available.)

The shadow of inflation, however, changes the picture entirely. In constant 2022 dollars, real median income was $81,2210 in 2019 and $79,650 in 2020. In 2021, as inflation took off, it fell to $79,260. The following year, it declined to $77,540. On the day after the debate, the Department of Commerce released the 2023 data showing that real median income had climbed to $80,610, the first time in Biden’s presidency that the median income had exceeded median income in Trump’s final year, the year of the pandemic. It’s still below the pre-pandemic level under Trump.

Three straight years of declining real income—one under Trump, during the pandemic, and two under Biden—is a rarity. The last time real income declined at all was a single year in 2014, when it fell from $68,200 to $67,300. Prior to that, incomes declined from a pre-financial crisis peak in 2007 through the trough in 2011.

To put it another way, prior to the pandemic hitting in 2020, median income had been on the rise for five years. When Joe Biden ran on a platform of restoring the economy in the wake of the pandemic and growing it “from the bottom up and the middle out,” voters certainly did not expect they were going to see real incomes continue to fall for another two years.

Consumer Sentiment Is Worse Now Than During the Pandemic

The University of Michigan’s survey of consumer sentiment reflects the damage this has done. Four years ago, the index of consumer sentiment was at 74.1. The consumer expectations subindex read 68.5, while the current conditions came in at 82.9. The current conditions index had plunged 21.3 percent from a year earlier due to the onset of the pandemic.

So, where are we now? The most recent consumer sentiment index reading came in 67.9, which is 8.3 percent lower than it was in some of the worst days of the pandemic. In fact, throughout the pandemic year, consumer sentiment never fell below 70. It’s now been below that level for four consecutive months.

The expectations index is a bit higher than it was four years ago, at 72.1. But that’s entirely because Republicans are more optimistic today—with a reading of 56.3—than Democrats were in 2020—when they registered a score of 46.6. The current conditions reading at 61.3 is down by a jaw-dropping 26 percent.

There are, of course, some improvements over the past four years. The unemployment rate was twice as high in August of 2020 than it is today, for example. But many Americans quite reasonably do not use exactly four years ago as the baseline—the point of the question isn’t really to ask about four years ago but to compare progress during a presidential administration. And the unemployment rate just prior to the pandemic was lower than it is today, at 3.5 percent. Indeed, unemployment had been lower under Trump for two years than it is now.

No wonder why Harris did everything she could to talk around the most important question of this election.

Originally Posted At www.breitbart.com


Stay Updated with news.freeptomaineradio.com’s Daily Newsletter

Stay informed! Subscribe to our daily newsletter to receive updates on our latest blog posts directly in your inbox. Don’t let important information get buried by big tech.





Current subscribers:

Nine US Senators Launch Inquiry Into Kamala Harris’ Failure As ‘Broadband Czar’

Nine US Senators Launch Inquiry Into Kamala Harris’ Failure As ‘Broadband Czar’

FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr criticized the Biden-Harris administration, pointing out that their $42.45 billion program to bring high-speed internet to rural America has yet to connect a single person. He said it had been 1,038 days, and “not a single person has been connected” since the program debuted.

Carr on X pushed out a post in the early afternoon of Wednesday featuring a new letter from nine US senators, including Sen. John Thune (R-S.D.) and Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX), stressing concern about VP Harris’ time as ‘broadband czar’ entirely mismanaged the $42.45 billion program to connect rural America. Considering that not a single home in rural America has been connected, the senators warned that the failures are piling up for VP Harris, citing her failure as ‘border czar.’

Dear Vice President Harris:

We are writing to express serious concerns regarding your role as the Biden-Harris administration’s “broadband czar” and the mismanagement of federal broadband initiatives under your leadership. It appears that your performance as “broadband czar” has mirrored your performance as “border czar,” marked by poor management and a lack of effectiveness despite significant federal broadband investments and your promises to deliver broadband to rural areas.

As you are aware, Congress, through the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, provided the National Telecommunications and Information Administration with $42.45 billion for the Broadband, Equity, Access, and Deployment (BEAD) program. These funds are intended to provide broadband access to unserved communities, particularly those in rural areas.

In 2021, you were specifically tasked by President Biden to lead the administration’s efforts to expand broadband services to unserved Americans. And at the time, you stated, “we can bring broadband to rural America today.” Despite your assurances over three years ago, rural and unserved communities continue to wait for the connectivity they were promised. Under your leadership, not a single person has been connected to the internet using the $42.45 billion allocated for the BEAD program. Indeed, Politico recently reported on “the messy, delayed rollout of” this program.

Instead of focusing on delivering broadband services to unserved areas, your administration has used the BEAD program to add partisan, extralegal requirements that were never envisioned by Congress and have obstructed broadband deployment. By imposing burdensome climate change mandates on infrastructure projects, prioritizing government-owned networks over private investment, mandating the use of unionized labor in states, and seeking to regulate broadband rates, your administration has caused unnecessary delays leaving millions of Americans unconnected.

The administration’s lack of focus on truly connecting the unconnected has failed the American people and represents a gross misuse of limited taxpayer dollars. The American public deserves better.

‘All-In’ podcast host Jason Calacanis recently said, “Our government is corrupt and stealing our money. United airlines just put Starlink on 1,000+ planes, but the FCC claims we need to spend 5-10k per rural home for wired connections?!? These homes are putting starlink in on their nickel while they wait for a cable modem in 10 years — wtf??? Pure corruption or insane stupidity — you decide!”

Carr recently chimed in and said Elon Musk’s Starlink offered the FCC a secured commitment of $1,300 per household for 640,000 rural locations. He said in 2023, the federal government rejected Starlink and decided to spend $100,000 per location. 

Musk said Wednesday that the FCC rejected Starlink because of “lawfare.” 

Here’s what X users are saying about an inefficient and what appears to be a ‘corruption’ within the Biden-Harris admin:

Good question.

* * *

Tyler Durden
Wed, 09/18/2024 – 18:00

Fears of all-out war as new Lebanon device blasts kill 14, wound 450

Fears of all-out war as new Lebanon device blasts kill 14, wound 450

A second wave of device explosions killed 20 people and wounded more than 450 others on Wednesday in Hezbollah strongholds in Lebanon, officials said, stoking fears of an all-out war with Israel. A source close to Hezbollah said walkie-talkies used by its members blew up in its Beirut stronghold, with state media reporting similar blasts […]

The post Fears of all-out war as new Lebanon device blasts kill 20, wound 450 appeared first on Insider Paper.

Trilateral Commission’s Goal Of Technocracy Pursues Immigration Crisis To Get There

Trilateral Commission’s Goal Of Technocracy Pursues Immigration Crisis To Get There

by Patrick Wood, Activist Post: Technocracy is a system pitted against all others, including capitalism, Marxism, and outright Fascism. However, it will use those other systems to achieve its goals of Scientific Dictatorship. The Trilateral Commission kickstarted modern Technocracy in 1973 and devised a policy of using mass immigration as a tool to break down […]

Ukraine planning ‘inhumane’ false flag attack – Russian intelligence

from RT: A children’s facility could be targeted, the SVR has claimed Kiev is preparing a false flag operation, in which a children’s hospital or kindergarten could be hit by a supposed Russian missile strike, the Russian Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR) has claimed. TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/ The “inhumane provocation” is being masterminded by the leaders of […]