Back to School—A Critique of the College Model
Economics News philosophy Politics Science

Back to School—A Critique of the College Model


In a recent conversation with my college-educated friend, they expressed their sentiments that college, for many, was a waste, echoing a common critique among libertarians. Further, they continued, that if they were not led to believe that college would guarantee a well-paying career, they could have started working earlier, developing real-world skills, therefore, making closer to the comfortable pay of their non-college-attending colleagues. While some may view higher education as a necessary step towards personal and professional growth, others argue that the current system is plagued by inefficiencies, inflated costs, and a lack of connection to the job market.

Libertarians argue that the current college system isn’t sustainable due to its reliance on federal guarantees for student loans. This “blank check” has led to rising tuition prices, as colleges know they can basically borrow unlimited funds to finance their day-to-day operation. Without market forces reigning in costs, colleges have almost no incentive to get creative or reduce their expenses. As a result, many students graduate with enormous debt, and many without even securing jobs that justify their investment.

Many libertarians would agree that the education system prioritizes left-leaning indoctrination over gaining knowledge and real-world life skills, offering many programs that focus on irrelevant subjects rather than vocational training. This focus on theory-over-function application leads to a disconnect between education and employment, as graduates rarely can find jobs that align with their degrees.

In a perfect world, education would be decentralized and market-driven. Students would have more freedom to choose programs that align with their interests and career goals, rather than being covered into traditional liberal arts or STEM programs. Giving that choice would encourage innovation and competition among colleges, leading to lower costs while also increasing the value of the degrees.

Additionally, while many colleges solely focus on degrees with little real-world application, ideally there would be a shift towards vocational training and apprenticeships, providing students with hands-on experience and skills useful to the ever-changing job market. This approach would also reduce the burden on taxpayers, as government subsidies for higher education would be minimal. Some might think that prioritizing vocational training discourages higher learning and creates a worker economy, but that ignores the individual entirely and their ability to enrich themselves outside of the college environment. Online courses, lectures, and community programs can provide access to a wide range of subjects and skills without the need for a traditional college degree.

Furthermore, many libertarians would argue that the current system’s focus on “theoretical knowledge” has led to a lack of practical problem-solving skills and adaptability in life as a whole, let alone through the workforce. A more market-driven approach to education would prioritize these types of skills, better preparing students for the current landscape of the job market.

In conclusion, my friend’s assertion that college, for many, is a waste is certainly valid. To combat this increasingly-common sentiment, it’s clear that a more libertarian approach is necessary. While some may disagree with this perspective, it’s essential to acknowledge the very real concerns about cost, relevance, and effectiveness. It’s no secret that college loans are predatory, but the answer is how to combat this practice varies.

By decentralizing education, promoting vocational training, and embracing market forces, libertarians aim to create a solution that better serves students and society as a whole. Ultimately, the debate surrounding college and its value highlights the need for innovation and reform in education. As it benefits us all to create a more efficient and effective system, we must consider the libertarian perspective as a valuable answer to a long unanswered problem.

 


Originally Posted at https://mises.org/


Stay Updated with news.freeptomaineradio.com’s Daily Newsletter

Stay informed! Subscribe to our daily newsletter to receive updates on our latest blog posts directly in your inbox. Don’t let important information get buried by big tech.



Current subscribers:

Nine US Senators Launch Inquiry Into Kamala Harris’ Failure As ‘Broadband Czar’

Nine US Senators Launch Inquiry Into Kamala Harris’ Failure As ‘Broadband Czar’

FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr criticized the Biden-Harris administration, pointing out that their $42.45 billion program to bring high-speed internet to rural America has yet to connect a single person. He said it had been 1,038 days, and “not a single person has been connected” since the program debuted.

Carr on X pushed out a post in the early afternoon of Wednesday featuring a new letter from nine US senators, including Sen. John Thune (R-S.D.) and Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX), stressing concern about VP Harris’ time as ‘broadband czar’ entirely mismanaged the $42.45 billion program to connect rural America. Considering that not a single home in rural America has been connected, the senators warned that the failures are piling up for VP Harris, citing her failure as ‘border czar.’

Dear Vice President Harris:

We are writing to express serious concerns regarding your role as the Biden-Harris administration’s “broadband czar” and the mismanagement of federal broadband initiatives under your leadership. It appears that your performance as “broadband czar” has mirrored your performance as “border czar,” marked by poor management and a lack of effectiveness despite significant federal broadband investments and your promises to deliver broadband to rural areas.

As you are aware, Congress, through the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, provided the National Telecommunications and Information Administration with $42.45 billion for the Broadband, Equity, Access, and Deployment (BEAD) program. These funds are intended to provide broadband access to unserved communities, particularly those in rural areas.

In 2021, you were specifically tasked by President Biden to lead the administration’s efforts to expand broadband services to unserved Americans. And at the time, you stated, “we can bring broadband to rural America today.” Despite your assurances over three years ago, rural and unserved communities continue to wait for the connectivity they were promised. Under your leadership, not a single person has been connected to the internet using the $42.45 billion allocated for the BEAD program. Indeed, Politico recently reported on “the messy, delayed rollout of” this program.

Instead of focusing on delivering broadband services to unserved areas, your administration has used the BEAD program to add partisan, extralegal requirements that were never envisioned by Congress and have obstructed broadband deployment. By imposing burdensome climate change mandates on infrastructure projects, prioritizing government-owned networks over private investment, mandating the use of unionized labor in states, and seeking to regulate broadband rates, your administration has caused unnecessary delays leaving millions of Americans unconnected.

The administration’s lack of focus on truly connecting the unconnected has failed the American people and represents a gross misuse of limited taxpayer dollars. The American public deserves better.

‘All-In’ podcast host Jason Calacanis recently said, “Our government is corrupt and stealing our money. United airlines just put Starlink on 1,000+ planes, but the FCC claims we need to spend 5-10k per rural home for wired connections?!? These homes are putting starlink in on their nickel while they wait for a cable modem in 10 years — wtf??? Pure corruption or insane stupidity — you decide!”

Carr recently chimed in and said Elon Musk’s Starlink offered the FCC a secured commitment of $1,300 per household for 640,000 rural locations. He said in 2023, the federal government rejected Starlink and decided to spend $100,000 per location. 

Musk said Wednesday that the FCC rejected Starlink because of “lawfare.” 

Here’s what X users are saying about an inefficient and what appears to be a ‘corruption’ within the Biden-Harris admin:

Good question.

* * *

Tyler Durden
Wed, 09/18/2024 – 18:00

Fears of all-out war as new Lebanon device blasts kill 14, wound 450

Fears of all-out war as new Lebanon device blasts kill 14, wound 450

A second wave of device explosions killed 20 people and wounded more than 450 others on Wednesday in Hezbollah strongholds in Lebanon, officials said, stoking fears of an all-out war with Israel. A source close to Hezbollah said walkie-talkies used by its members blew up in its Beirut stronghold, with state media reporting similar blasts […]

The post Fears of all-out war as new Lebanon device blasts kill 20, wound 450 appeared first on Insider Paper.

Trilateral Commission’s Goal Of Technocracy Pursues Immigration Crisis To Get There

Trilateral Commission’s Goal Of Technocracy Pursues Immigration Crisis To Get There

by Patrick Wood, Activist Post: Technocracy is a system pitted against all others, including capitalism, Marxism, and outright Fascism. However, it will use those other systems to achieve its goals of Scientific Dictatorship. The Trilateral Commission kickstarted modern Technocracy in 1973 and devised a policy of using mass immigration as a tool to break down […]

Ukraine planning ‘inhumane’ false flag attack – Russian intelligence

from RT: A children’s facility could be targeted, the SVR has claimed Kiev is preparing a false flag operation, in which a children’s hospital or kindergarten could be hit by a supposed Russian missile strike, the Russian Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR) has claimed. TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/ The “inhumane provocation” is being masterminded by the leaders of […]