There’s No Sign of Relief from Ballooning Federal Deficits


The Treasury Department posted its latest revenue and spending totals this week, and deficits continue to mount at impressive speed.

During October—the first month of the 2025 fiscal year—the federal deficit was more than a quarter of a trillion dollars, coming in at $257.4 billion. Tax revenue in October had totaled $326 billion, but spending totaled $584 billion.

Now one month into the new fiscal year, the federal government is on pace to add more than $2 trillion dollars to the national debt during the 2025 fiscal year. If the economy significantly worsens in coming months—and tax revenues plummet as they do during times of economic trouble—the deficit will be much larger than $2 trillion.
There is no sign of any relief from mounting deficits. The 2024 fiscal year ended on September 30 with the FY’s total deficit coming in at $1.8 trillion. That’s the largest deficit in three years and is the worst since 2021 when the US will in the midst of the Covid Panic.

With this additional $1.8 trillion added to the national debt, the total debt is now over $35 trillion. Federal spending has trended up since the third quarter of 2023, once again accelerating overall growth in the debt, and all but ensuring total debt will top $36 trillion by the time Donald Trump is sworn in in January 2025.

Federal spending today remains well above where it was prior to the covid lockdowns in the first quarter of 2020. Moreover, deficits have trended deeper into negative territory in recent months.

Although the issue of the national debt was largely ignored during the presidential campaign, the debt is likely to have a growing effect on interest rates as the federal government continues to issue ever larger amounts of Treasurys. This will put upward pressure on interest rates even as the central bank attempts to cut short-term interest rates.

For example, although the Federal reserve cut the target interest rate in September, the ten-year Treasury has grown since mid-September to four-month highs. This is likely being fueled in part by bond investors’ expectation of even more deficit spending and the need to issue ever larger amounts of federal debt—thus driving down bond prices and driving up yields.

This presents a problem for many sectors of the economy that have become dependent on ever-falling interest rates such as the many zombie companies that are deeply in debt and will need to refinance in the near future. Bankruptcies will follow. Many consumers will also put off large purchases as financing becomes more expensive. This is likely to become more evident given how the 30-year mortgage rate—which generally follows the 10-year Treasury yield—has risen from 6.1 percent to 6.8 percent since September. Not surprisingly, the market has slowed in recent months.

The Trump administration has stated that it plans to slash as much as $2 trillion from the federal budget, using the so-called “Department of Government Efficiency” (DOGE) under Elon Musk. More sophisticated observers of fiscal policy are unlikely to find this very convincing, however. The DOGE group has little influence over what budgets Congress approves. DOGE’s recommendations will remain just that—recommendations—to the White House’s Office of Management and Budget (OMB).

Those who have watched the budget process in the past know that budget recommendations from the OMB are generally DOA at the Congress. There’s no reason to believe this will be different in 2025, especially with such an evenly divided Congress, and with Senate leadership positions controlled by spendthrift old-guard Republicans.

 


Originally Posted at https://mises.org/


  • Related Posts

    Trump Vows To Fire Woke Generals and DEI Hires

    by Sean Adl-Tabatabai, The Peoples Voice: Pentagon employees are panicking with “generals scrambling” due to the incoming Trump administration’s plans to fire woke military leaders who promoted DEI, according to sources. One source compared it to a hornet’s nest being kicked over and that “DEI pages are starting to disappear off the main websites.” “They’re […]

    Schiff: Powell Can’t Address Stagflation

    Schiff: Powell Can’t Address Stagflation

    Via SchiffGold.com,

    Peter caps off a very newsworthy week, in which the decisive Trump victory shocked the media class and another Fed rate cut was announced. Peter analyzes both events, arguing against the unbridled economic optimism of Trump’s supporters and criticizing Jerome Powell’s stance on Fed independence and his alarming lack of concern for a future of stagflation.

    Peter starts by highlighting the inconvenient trade-off between taxes and government spending. Trump promises new tax cuts, but these will need to be offset by spending cuts, lest the national debt balloons even further out of control:

    Trump would have to maybe have a fireside chat in front of the American public and level with them.

    He can say, when I was running for president, I promised a lot of things.

    I promised a lot of tax cuts… we really need higher taxes if we can’t get some serious cuts in spending.

    And so that’s what we’re going to try. I’m going to ask Americans to pitch in and tighten their belts.

    While both the Republicans and Democrats like to take credit for for the country’s economic growth, the reality is that much of this “growth” is an artificial boom induced and sustained by decades of expansionary monetary policy by the Federal Reserve:

    The problem was we didn’t have a strong economy. We had a bubble. We had a fragile economy.

    In fact, we’ve been blowing a bubble in this economy ever since the 1990s. Greenspan is the architect of this house of cards.

    He’s been blowing all the air in and every president going back to Clinton has been hiding behind his bubble and has been taking credit for the fake economic growth that has been a consequence of this ever-expanding bubble.

    With the stock market lifted by Trump’s success, Peter argues the best time to switch into US equities is when the aforementioned bubble pops. It’ll be painful in the short-term, but that’s when stocks will be a bargain:

    The time to load the boat with US stocks is not when they’re historically expensive. I’m waiting for blood in the streets. I want the collapse to happen…

    Now, I know when we initially do that and the economy is in recession and everybody is pessimistic, that’s when I’m going to be optimistic, because I’m going to know that this is the bitter tasting medicine that we should have swallowed a long time ago.

    Pivoting to the Fed rate cut, Peter points out that the Fed may have cut rates by less than they would have had Kamala Harris been elected instead of Donald Trump:

    You would assume that if we’re going to have a stronger economy, the Fed should reconsider the rate cuts, maybe even pause or hike rates.

    I thought, well, there’s no chance the Fed’s going to do that. Trump would go ballistic—they’re going to cut. And that’s exactly what they did.

    One reason the dollar has been so strong is that people are thinking, well, maybe the Fed won’t cut as much now that we’re expecting a stronger economy.

    Peter takes aim at Jerome Powell’s political cowardice, in which he uses the Fed’s independence as an excuse to avoid criticizing bad fiscal policy:

    Being independent doesn’t mean you have to keep your mouth shut and you can’t speak your mind and you can’t be critical.

    It actually means the opposite of it.

    When you’re independent, you’re not influenced by politicians, so you could say whatever the hell you want to say.

    You can criticize whoever you want to criticize, and that is exactly what his job is.

    At Thursday’s Fed press conference, Powell dodged a question about the possibility of stagflation. Peter sees this as a major gaffe:

    He [Powell] kind of says, “Well, our plan for stagflation is to hope there is no stagflation.”

    Then he laughed, realizing how ridiculous that sounded.

    I mean, what kind of plan is that? Your plan is to hope it doesn’t happen. .. Because obviously, it’s possible.

    So, what are you going to do? That’s the question, not what you hope will happen. What’s your plan?

    They’ve got no plan. That’s why they hope it doesn’t happen.

    But, you know, Murphy has a law, right?

    Anything that can go wrong will go wrong. We’re going to have stagflation.

    Donald Trump’s has likely halted economic progressivism from corrupting the White House, but with the debt still expanding and the Federal Reserve still setting price controls on interest rates, the economy is far from healthy.

    Tyler Durden
    Fri, 11/15/2024 – 07:20

    You Missed

    There’s No Sign of Relief from Ballooning Federal Deficits

    • By Mises
    • November 15, 2024
    • 1 views
    There’s No Sign of Relief from Ballooning Federal Deficits

    Trump Vows To Fire Woke Generals and DEI Hires

    Trump Vows To Fire Woke Generals and DEI Hires

    Schiff: Powell Can’t Address Stagflation

    Schiff: Powell Can’t Address Stagflation

    Tropical Storm Sara Public Advisory

    • By NHC
    • November 15, 2024
    • 1 views

    Primary schools empty as smog persists in Indian capital

    Primary schools empty as smog persists in Indian capital

    Tropical Storm Sara Public Advisory Number 7

    • By NHC
    • November 15, 2024
    • 2 views