Climate Anxiety: A Regime-Created “Illness”


A quick internet search for “climate anxiety,” which is also often referred to as “eco-anxiety,” “eco-grief,” or “climate doom,” produces numerous links to the psychological and psychiatric literature on the topic. The Program on Climate Change Communication within the Yale School of the Environment appears to be a major contributor to this research. Mental health professionals and mass trauma researchers report seeing more patients with symptoms of this anxiety, but they’re not always sure how to treat it.

Climate Anxiety Isn’t a Medical Diagnosis

Reputable medical establishments such as the Cleveland Clinic clarify that, although this psychological condition isn’t a medical diagnosis, it is a commonly-accepted popular term used to describe a collection of symptoms triggered by long-term shifts in temperature and weather patterns, and can be exacerbated by other existing anxiety disorders. Experts find that the age 16-34 demographic—those known as Generation Z and Millennials—is particularly vulnerable to climate anxiety.

Some even believe that the condition may increase the risk of developing post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), a mental health condition that is caused by either being part of an extremely traumatic event, or witnessing it. Some also believe that indigenous people are some of the most vulnerable populations to experience negative impacts as a result of direct exposure to climate change. The list of climate-anxiety symptoms is extensive:

  • A sense of being overwhelmed and helpless in the face of changing climate and weather patterns;
  • Worrying about the future;
  • Exposure to headlines about natural disaster or reading about climate change news;
  • Losing sleep over climate change, a sense of impending doom, feelings of anger at oneself and/or others;
  • Experiencing a sense of guilt or shame;
  • Avoidance of conversations or activities as a way of avoiding environmental triggers; and,
  • Lack of confidence in making major life decisions.

An example of this last symptom might be, for example, decisions about having children because of the belief that they would damage the planet (or because the planet could damage children). This is increasingly a fear that many young adults—the demographic most vulnerable to climate anxiety—have expressed and that could have serious repercussions for the entire world.

Experts Say Worrying about Climate is Healthy

Investigators at the Yale climate change program have found that 64 percent of Americans said they were “at least somewhat worried” about global warming. These mental health experts believe that this 64 percent finding in itself is healthy because worrying somewhat about something motivates a person to figure out what he can do about it. Thus, they advocate that more people should be worried about climate change.

But they also caution that worry can be a problem if it becomes overwhelming and debilitating, keeping a person from living one’s life, at which point it becomes a serious diagnosis. Climate anxiety, moreover, is highly correlated with generalized anxiety, so it tends to affect people who are already anxious about other aspects of their lives.

Further findings include that among Americans:

  • 9 percent report feeling down, depressed, or hopeless for at least several days out of the last two weeks
  • 12 percent say they struggle to stop themselves from consuming bad news about global warming
  • 8 percent say they are, or would be interested in, seeking counseling to discuss feelings about global warming
  • Very few are fatalistic that it’s already too late to do anything about global warming; most believe that the country can still solve the problem.

Help for the Helping Professions in Vermont

For those witnessing painful stress and tension caused by the climate crisis, the Vermont Collaborative for Practice Improvement and Innovation (VCPI) offers a 12-week course for individuals in the helping professions to build their own climate resilience and grow “ecological emotional intelligence.” The course, entitled “From Climate Anxiety to Climate Resilience,” is normally offered at $1,200 tuition, but discounted to $899. It is designed to assist coaches, educators, health or mental health providers, social workers, healers, and other helping professionals to maintain their own composure when sharing the same overwhelming feelings as those they are trying to help.

Topics covered in the course include creating safe spaces, one-on-one or small groups to foster genuine conversation for patients who are alarmed or obsessing about abnormal weather patterns, devastating floods, tsunamis, erupting volcanoes, and melting glaciers. Thus, everyone can rest assured that the helping professions are studying the rising tide (no pun intended) of climate anxiety and ways to ameliorate it. And standing behind their helping efforts are Ivy League universities and state government agencies with their expertise.

Nagging Thoughts and Questions About “Climate Anxiety,” Identification, and Treatment

While some may question that a small New England state is sponsoring a class to assist the “helping professions” build their own climate resilience and grow “ecological emotional intelligence,” it is also sobering to consider that such instruction is necessary at all. What kind of society must offer instruction for these professionals so they do not lose their composure when treating others who exhibit symptoms of this psychological condition?

Is this newfound variant of anxiety so prevalent among the populace that the helping professionals themselves need extra assistance to buttress themselves as they help others who are assisting the general population? In any case, identification and treatment of climate anxiety could be considered a means to keep the helping professions employed.

And if climate anxiety is so prevalent, what might be the basis of this affliction? On this etiological level, one might question whether this newfound psychological condition may in fact be another example of using fear as a means to control the populace and manipulate people to behave in particular ways.

Some commentators contend that the recent pandemic lockdowns, mandates, and social restrictions, implemented by public health experts to avert virus contagion, represented a “dress rehearsal” for something similar with respect to climate change. Thus, climate anxiety may portend climate experts’ imposition of similar measures on the populace as a means to mitigate the effects of climate change.

Lastly, a case can be made that every individual must have choices in deciding what may cause our anxiety, unburdened by what others may want to tell us what we should fear. If I currently fear that I’m getting old, aging more rapidly than I think I should, this fear must surely in some way be caused by climate change. After all, the United Nations and other entities constantly remind us that climate change is an existential threat. Why do I, an aging American whose very existence is ultimately on the line, not exhibit the symptoms of climate anxiety?

 


Originally Posted at https://mises.org/


  • Related Posts

    New FOIA Emails: NIH Silenced Own Expert on Covid Origin

    by Jeff Carlson & Hans Mahncke, Truth Over News: The National Institutes of Health (NIH) is hiring a new chief for their virology section. That the federal government should not be hiring anyone, especially not senior staff, during the lame-duck period is self-evident. But what is in many ways even more notable about this appointment is that […]

    Phony Partisan “Charities” Overplayed Their Hand In 2024

    Phony Partisan “Charities” Overplayed Their Hand In 2024

    Authored by Parker Thayer via RealClearPolitics,

    It’s not your imagination; get-out-the-vote ads were more obnoxious this year. Thousands of people were shocked to receive intimidating letters claiming their voting history was being monitored, “nonpartisan” mail-in ballot request forms bearing Michelle Obama’s face, misleading text messages telling them they had already voted, and remember-to-vote postcards designed to look like lottery tickets. Most people had never seen tactics like these before, but they were everywhere in 2024.

    Why?

    The short answer is that sagging polls made the left’s get-out-the-vote (GOTV) machine desperate, and it dug deep in its bag of tricks to find ways to win. The full answer requires a peek under the hood of the left’s vote machine to discover the hubris of identity politics and Democratic donors.

    Most of the obnoxious ads came from voter registration “charities” legally required to be nonpartisan. Despite the law, it’s been an open secret for years – decades – that groups like Voter Participation Center, Everybody Votes Campaign, and State Voices exist almost exclusively to help Democrats win by “organizing” the “New American Majority,” a made-up cocktail of all demographic groups that just so happen to favor Democrats. Hundreds of groups use this model, and a $1 billion industry thrived in the shadows, thanks to the neglect of the IRS and the media.

    The industry enjoyed tremendous success in 2020, registering millions of swing-state voters to defeat Trump while attracting more donors than ever before, but after 2020, everything began to collapse. The industry’s success led to unprecedented scrutiny from journalists, Republican legislators, think-tank leaders, and even law enforcement. For the first time, voter registration groups were hiring PR staff. Meanwhile, actual members of the “New American Majority” were leaving the Democratic Party.

    It started as a trickle.

    In November 2023, George Soros canceled a $67 million pledge to Latino get-out-the-vote groups after “Democrats [saw] Latinos peel away from the party.” In January 2024, an interview with the leader of the Everybody Votes Campaign, the industry’s biggest player, revealed that Everybody Votes, which had registered around 850,000 voters annually and 5.1 million total from 2017-22, had only registered 400,000 more by the start of 2024. The interview also showed EVC was struggling to circumvent newly passed election integrity laws because “keeping up with those laws is time-consuming, it’s expensive … partners, and even funders, are getting worried that this work is too risky.”

    In April 2024, the trickle of desertions from the would-be “Majority” became a flood when a memo from Democratic strategist Aaron Strauss “sparked a furious debate in Democratic circles about whether to narrow the focus of voter registration efforts to avoid signing up likely Republicans.” The memo advised Democratic megadonors to abandon “nonpartisan” voter registration because most unregistered voters were now Republicans. “Indeed, if we were to blindly register nonvoters and get them on the rolls, we would be distinctly aiding Trump’s quest for a personal dictatorship,” Strauss declared.

    The memo was poorly received. Partisan donors were loath to give up their favorite tax-exempt toy, and the registration industrial complex wanted the money, so the grift continued. In 2024, AllByApril, a donor coalition led by eBay founder Pierre Omidyar, doubled down, ensuring checks to voter registration groups were delivered by April to maximize election impact. The campaign raised $150+ million and was joined by 174 donors. Perhaps some donors quietly cut back, but it seems like Strauss’ warning was ignored.

    As registrations became harder to collect, desperation mounted. Multiple vendors to Everybody Votes were caught fraudulently inflating their numbers. Voter Participation Center was caught filtering its Facebook ads to avoid Republicans. Finally, the creepy “we’ll know if you voted” ads were deployed, alienating the “charitable” GOTV industry’s possible allies. Now the industry finds itself alone against hundreds of disgruntled donors and a Republican trifecta that it accidentally helped create, while legislation to revoke the tax-exempt status of partisan “charities” is in vogue like never before.

    It’s poetic justice.

    Parker Thayer is an investigative researcher at the Capital Research Center.

    Tyler Durden
    Tue, 11/26/2024 – 07:20

    You Missed

    New FOIA Emails: NIH Silenced Own Expert on Covid Origin

    New FOIA Emails: NIH Silenced Own Expert on Covid Origin

    Phony Partisan “Charities” Overplayed Their Hand In 2024

    Phony Partisan “Charities” Overplayed Their Hand In 2024

    Father Or Victim? What Men Should Do If They Find Out The Children Aren’t Actually Theirs

    Father Or Victim? What Men Should Do If They Find Out The Children Aren’t Actually Theirs

    US firms up $7.9 billion chips award to Intel

    US firms up $7.9 billion chips award to Intel

    Hollywood Celebrities STILL Losing Their Minds Over Election, Studios Stay SILENT: The Pro Show LIVE

    • By WDWPro
    • November 26, 2024
    • 4 views
    Hollywood Celebrities STILL Losing Their Minds Over Election, Studios Stay SILENT: The Pro Show LIVE

    Universal’s WICKED Sails and Disney’s SNOW WHITE Fails! Sonic 3 Trailer | The Spice Lounge Podcast

    Universal’s WICKED Sails and Disney’s SNOW WHITE Fails! Sonic 3 Trailer | The Spice Lounge Podcast