Trump suggests Fed 'playing politics' with US rate cut
Economics News Politics

Trump suggests Fed ‘playing politics’ with US rate cut

Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump suggested the Federal Reserve was playing politics on Wednesday, after the US central bank announced a long-awaited interest rate cut of half a percentage point.

“I guess it shows the economy is very bad to cut it by that much, assuming they’re not just playing politics,” Trump said in televised comments from a bitcoin bar in New York. “The economy would be very bad or they’re playing politics, one or the other. But it was a big cut.”



https://insiderpaper.com/


Stay Updated with news.freeptomaineradio.com’s Daily Newsletter

Stay informed! Subscribe to our daily newsletter to receive updates on our latest blog posts directly in your inbox. Don’t let important information get buried by big tech.






Current subscribers:

Lesbian social worker gets £63,000 after lawsuit over being disciplined for misgendering ‘gender fluid’ dog
Business Economics Entertainment Gossip News philosophy Politics Religon Science Sports War Weather

Lesbian social worker gets £63,000 after lawsuit over being disciplined for misgendering ‘gender fluid’ dog


An incident involving a “gender-fluid” dog has cost taxpayers £63,000 after a social worker and another colleague referred to the pet as a male. The assertion left the dog’s owner outraged, prompting him to file a formal complaint accusing the pair of “transphobia,” which resulted in disciplinary action.

Elizabeth Pitt, a 62-year-old lesbian social worker, was subjected to harassment by her colleagues at Cambridgeshire County Council after she was accused of making “non-inclusive and transphobic” remarks about the dachshund owned by her colleague, Gleicon Analha, as reported by The Telegraph.

The incident occurred when Analha chaired a Zoom call of the authority’s LGBTQ employee group last year. During the call, Analha dressed his dachshund in a dress to spark a “debate about gender.” He claimed to the group that his dog was “gender-fluid.”

Pitt immediately denied that Analha’s dog was gender-fluid saying, “Your dog is male!” Another lesbian coworker agreed with Pitt and doubled down that the pooch is not, in fact, gender-fluid.

The pair reportedly proceeded to express gender-critical views, such as their criticism of trans-identified biological men competing in women’s sports and using female-only spaces.

The comments resulted in Pitt receiving disciplinary action from managers.

However, the authority was forced to pay £63,000 in costs and compensation after it eventually acknowledged being liable for blatant discrimination based on her beliefs after Pitt filed a tribunal complaint.

Analha claimed in the complaint to the authority, according to documents reviewed by the Daily Mail, that the two women made several “transphobic comments” about his dog Pablo Vittar which “caused an emotional impact on the peer group.”

The assertion that Pablo Vittar was a male, he said, left the group “silent and shocked,” adding that it felt like a personal attack on his “choices and lived experiences.”

“I found a way to bring awareness regarding gender and sexuality through my dog via Instagram and informal conversation on the streets,” Analha said. “I identify my dog as gender fluid, and I actually enjoy speaking with people about human gender expression and how we – as a society – imprinted this in animals and culturally we repeat the gender expressions and stereotypes to the young generation.”

“When the other employee stated, ‘Your dog is male!’ with a provocative and angry tone,” he continued, “The group was silent and shocked. She ignored our previous conversation and I felt this was the first attack on my personal choices and lived experience.”

The incident, he said, left people “shaking, feeling threatened and horrified with the disrespectful comments.”

Management implemented a formal disciplinary action against Pitt.

In formal complaints filed against her, her comments were characterized as “offensive” and “nasty opinions,” while another individual described her tone as “really aggressive.”

Pitt was ordered to refrain from making “comments or taking actions in the workplace that might discriminate against others on grounds of a protected characteristic.” She was also banned from contacting members of the LGBTQ group.

However, Pitt raised a complaint arguing that she was subjected “to harassment/direct discrimination” from the council based on her personal beliefs. An employment judge ruled in her favor and ordered the county council to pay her £30,000 in loss of earnings and £22,000 compensation for injury to feelings. The county council was also ordered to pay her £8,000 in legal fees.

This Story originally came from humanevents.com

 


Stay Updated with news.freeptomaineradio.com’s Daily Newsletter

Stay informed! Subscribe to our daily newsletter to receive updates on our latest blog posts directly in your inbox. Don’t let important information get buried by big tech.





Current subscribers:

‘I am a rapist like everyone else in this room’: French man who drugged wife, allowed dozens of men to rape her gives first trial testimony
Business Economics Entertainment Gossip News philosophy Politics Religon Science Sports War Weather

‘I am a rapist like everyone else in this room’: French man who drugged wife, allowed dozens of men to rape her gives first trial testimony


Dominique Pélicot, the French man on trial for drugging his wife and allowing dozens of men to rape her while she was unconscious, admitted in court that he is a rapist along with the other defendants involved in the case.

“I am a rapist, like everyone else in this room. They cannot say otherwise,” Pélicot declared during his first testimony in court. The statement directly contradicted the testimony of many of the 50 men accused, who previously claimed they were unaware that the wife had been drugged and had not consented to the sexual acts.

Investigators revealed that Pélicot regularly drugged his wife, Gisèle Pélicot, with anti-anxiety medication without her knowledge. While she was unconscious, she was raped at least 92 times by 72 men between 2011 and 2020. Of those, 51 individuals have been identified and charged in connection with the assaults. According to The Washington Post, Pélicot instructed the men to avoid wearing perfume or smoking to ensure his wife remained unconscious during the rapes.

Prosecutors have charged 49 men with rape, one with attempted rape, and one with sexual assault. Most of the defendants face sentences of up to 20 years in prison, according to Le Monde. Some of the accused have contested the charges, arguing they believed the acts were consensual within the couple.

Despite his admission, Pélicot claimed he did not force the men to participate.

“They came looking for me themselves. They asked me, I said yes. I didn’t put handcuffs on anyone to force them to come,” he testified.

Gisèle Pélicot only became aware of her husband’s actions in 2020 after police caught him filming up women’s skirts. Upon searching his electronic device, authorities discovered photos and videos documenting the assaults on his wife.

During her testimony, Gisèle Pélicot described the horror of realizing what had been done to her.

“When you see this woman, drugged, mistreated, dead on a bed — of course the body is not cold, it is warm, but I am like dead,” she told judges in court earlier this month. “These men are defiling me, taking advantage of me.”

This Story originally came from humanevents.com

 


Stay Updated with news.freeptomaineradio.com’s Daily Newsletter

Stay informed! Subscribe to our daily newsletter to receive updates on our latest blog posts directly in your inbox. Don’t let important information get buried by big tech.





Current subscribers:

Agatha After Party: Episode 1-2 | Disney CUTS Subscription Prices as Agatha FAILS to Drive Interest!
Business Entertainment News philosophy

Agatha After Party: Episode 1-2 | Disney CUTS Subscription Prices as Agatha FAILS to Drive Interest!


Originally Posted At WDW Pro YouTube Channel

thatparkplace.com

 


Stay Updated with news.freeptomaineradio.com’s Daily Newsletter

Stay informed! Subscribe to our daily newsletter to receive updates on our latest blog posts directly in your inbox. Don’t let important information get buried by big tech.





Current subscribers:

- YouTube
Entertainment News Politics

Pixar FORCED To Make Inside Out 2 LESS Gay | Disney Backing AWAY From Woke After Too Many FAILS

Originally_Posted_At_Doomcocks_YouTube_Channel


Stay Updated with news.freeptomaineradio.com’s Daily Newsletter

Stay informed! Subscribe to our daily newsletter to receive updates on our latest blog posts directly in your inbox. Don’t let important information get buried by big tech.





Current subscribers:

Fed Goes Big: Cuts Rates by Half Percentage Point
Business Economics Entertainment Gossip News Politics Sports War

Fed Goes Big: Cuts Rates by Half Percentage Point


The Federal Reserve moved to cut interest rates by a half percentage point—the first reduction since the central bank cut rates to near zero when the pandemic struck in 2020—in a vote of confidence that inflation will continue to moderate and an attempt to fend off a further increase in unemployment.

“Recent indicators suggest that economic activity has continued to expand at a solid pace. Job gains have slowed, and the unemployment rate has moved up but remains low. Inflation has made further progress toward the Committee’s 2 percent objective but remains somewhat elevated,” the Fed said in a statement.

The Fed’s benchmark rate will now be a range of 4.75 to 5 percent, where it last was in April of 2023.

Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) and other Democrat lawmakers had called on Powell to cut rates more aggressively, urging the Fed in a letter to reduce its benchmark federal funds rate by three-quarters of a percentage point.

Powell said that the cut on Wednesday was the beginning of a process to move the Fed away from a restrictive monetary policy but added that Fed policy is “not on any preset course.” Powell argued that the 50 basis point cut on Wednesday was not a guarantee that future cuts would be that at large.

“I don’t think anyone should look at this and say, ‘This is the new pace,’” Powell said.

The decision to lower rates reflects increased confidence on the part of Fed officials that inflation is moving sustainably toward their two percent target.

Fed officials have also said that they now view the risks to their mandate to maintain full employment to be greater than the risks of a resurgence of inflation. Earlier this summer, the unemployment rate tripped the Sahm Rule threshold by rising more than a half a percentage point above its recent low, typically a signal that the economy is already in a recession. Claudia Sahm, whose research is behind the rule, has said she does not think the economy is currently in a recession but worries that restrictive monetary policy could unnecessarily increase unemployment even more.

Evidence for a weakening labor market, however, has been scarce. Hiring in June and July disappointed and revisions showed it was weaker than expected. But, at least in the government’s preliminary estimate, payroll growth rebounded in August. Layoffs have been low, with jobless claims last week around where they were a year ago.

Both retail spending and industrial production came in better than expected in August, according to reports released this week.

The last time the Fed began cutting rates prior to the pandemic, in July 2019, the benchmark rate was a range of two percent to 2.25 percent. The Fed began cutting then as a pre-emptive strike to stave off what it feared would be a looming global slowdown and ameliorate any damage to the economy from trade tensions.

The Fed also released a new set of economic projections of Fed officials. The median forecast for the fed funds rate at the end of this year fell from 5.1 percent to 4.4 percent. Next year’s projection was brought down to 3.4 percent from 4.1 percent. Officials also see an improved picture for inflation, projecting the personal consumption expenditures price index to be up 2.3 percent for this year instead of 2.6 percent and 2.1 percent next year instead of 2.3 percent.

The longer-run projection for the fed funds rate rose to 2.9 percent, four-tenths of a point above the 2.5 percent the Fed had consistently projected from 2019 through the end of last year. In the June projections, officials had indicated an expectation for a longer run rate of 2.8 percent.

On the other hand, unemployment is now seen as going higher. When the Fed last released projections in June, officials forecast a four percent rate of unemployment at year-end. The new projections have unemployment rising to 4.4 percent. Next year, unemployment is seen as staying at 4.4 percent, up from the earlier estimate of 4.2 percent. Similarly, the median projection for economic growth ticked down to two percent from 2.1 percent this year.

Eleven officials voted for the rate cut. One Fed governor, Michelle Bowman, dissented, preferring a quarter-point cut.

Originally Posted At www.breitbart.com


Stay Updated with news.freeptomaineradio.com’s Daily Newsletter

Stay informed! Subscribe to our daily newsletter to receive updates on our latest blog posts directly in your inbox. Don’t let important information get buried by big tech.





Current subscribers:

‘If He Can Take a Bullet, I Can Write a Song’: ‘American Heart’ Singer/Songwriter Jon Kahn Releases Trump-Inspired ‘Fighter’
Business Economics Entertainment Gossip News Politics Sports War

‘If He Can Take a Bullet, I Can Write a Song’: ‘American Heart’ Singer/Songwriter Jon Kahn Releases Trump-Inspired ‘Fighter’


When Breitbart’s own singer/songwriter Jon Kahn sat down at the piano recently, he had one simple thought: What kind of man could withstand the relentless barrage of attacks that have been leveled at former President Donald Trump?

The answer was as simple as the question: a FIGHTER.

Kahn told us: “I’ve always wondered how Trump gets out of bed every day given everything that’s been thrown at him and his family: two impeachments, deplatforming from social media, the entire democrat media complex fighting in concert to destroy him, unprecedented lawfare, and now two assassination attempts.”

And so, the origins of “FIGHTER” were born.  With a few lyrics and a couple of chords, Kahn took the idea to Nashville where he sat down with veteran hitmaker, Chris Wallin, who’s written songs for the likes of Garth Brooks, Kenny Chesney, Toby Keith, and Trace Adkins to name a few.

Both songwriters wanted “FIGHTER” to be a musical character study of a man who never gives up no matter what he’s facing. Released by Nashville label Baste Records, “FIGHTER” is accompanied by a stirring black and white video portrait of a man that shows not only his resilience and fight but also love.

WATCH:

When asked about potential backlash, Kahn told us, “If he can take a bullet, I can write a song. Everybody should find their own method of fighting for what they believe in particularly in times like these. For me and Chris, it was this song.”

“FIGHTER”

I’ve been down
Counted out
Smiling through the taste of blood
In my own mouth

I got bruises
Broken bones
But they don’t know
I ain’t in this ring alone

I’m a fighter
No one can say that I’m a run and hider
I was born to be a do or die-er
A make it righter
Don’t throw that towel just yet
Don’t cash in that last bet
Cause I hit harder when I’m tired
I’m a fighter

I get back up
That’s what I do
I didn’t soldier on this far just to lose

So take your shot
Is that all you got?

I’m a fighter
No one can say that I’m a run and hider
I was born to be a do or die-er
A make it righter
Don’t throw that towel just yet
Don’t cash in that last bet
Cause I hit harder when I’m tired
I’m a fighter

No one can keep me down
They didn’t know but they know now

That I’m a fighter
No one can say that I’m a run and hider
Don’t cash in that last bet
Don’t throw that towel just yet
I’m a fighter

FOLLOW Jon Kahn on Instagram
FOLLOW
Chris Wallin on Instagram

Originally Posted At www.breitbart.com


Stay Updated with news.freeptomaineradio.com’s Daily Newsletter

Stay informed! Subscribe to our daily newsletter to receive updates on our latest blog posts directly in your inbox. Don’t let important information get buried by big tech.





Current subscribers:

NewsWare's Trade Talk: Wednesday, September 18 | NewsWare‘s Trade Talk
Business Economics News

NewsWare’s Trade Talk: Wednesday, September 18 | NewsWare‘s Trade Talk

S&P Futures are positive this morning and are likely to remain in a holding pattern until this afternoon Fed Announcement. The size of the cute, the Dot Plot & Powell’s Press Conference will be in focus today. Additional monetary policy meeting this will include Thursdays BOE meeting and Friday’s BOJ meeting. The Biden administration is moving forward with its tariff plans on shipments valued under $800. CRWD is holding an investor briefing today at 2:00 pm. JP Morgan has entered into talks with AAPL over its credit card business. In Europe, markets are in the red this morning with weakness in healthcare, tech & luxury stocks, Oil prices have turned lower as stockpile estimates came in with a build.

Home for this information is at NewsWare‘s Trade Talk homepage at this link


Stay Updated with News.FreePtomaineRadio’s Daily Newsletter

Stay informed! Subscribe to our daily newsletter to receive updates on our latest blog posts directly in your inbox. Don’t let important information get buried by big tech.






Current subscribers:

Understanding the Basics of Modern Banking
Economics News philosophy Politics Science

Understanding the Basics of Modern Banking


The monetary and banking system plays an incredibly important role in contemporary economies. Knowledge of how this system functions should therefore be spread as widely as possible, yet the education system barely instructs its students about this subject, if indeed it instructs them about it at all. This article aims to contribute to bridging this gap by giving a basic overview of how the system of money creation and banking works today. The reader may also be interested in studying the discussion of alternative systems, however, this article will focus only on describing the dominant system of the present.

Open Market Operations and Fractional-Reserve Banking (FRB)

The central bank has a monopoly of issuing notes, that is, physical currency. The difference between the face value of the currency created and the cost to produce it is called seigniorage, and it gives a profit to the monetary sovereign, in this case the central bank. The notes of contemporary central banks aren’t redeemable in anything but themselves; they are created out of nothing by the fiat, or order, of the central bank itself. It is likely that physical currency produced by central banks will be partially replaced by central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) in the near future. These will perform many of the same functions as physical currency, and preserve features like seigniorage.

Central banks are able to purchase assets from actors in the economy. They do this by writing a “check,” or demand deposit on themselves. These check are created out of nothing by fiat of the central bank, and are only redeemable in central bank notes. When the central bank purchases assets from regular banks using these checks (which are now electronic), the banks keep this money in reserve at their own accounts that they hold with the central bank. When the central bank purchases assets from other actors in the economy, the checks end up in the same place. The actor who receives the check in exchange for assets deposits it with his bank, and the bank, in turn, deposits it in its account with the central bank. The checks inevitably end up as reserves of regular banks held in the central bank, due to the type of money involved. These checks, called central bank reserve currency, serve as demand deposits, or claims, against the central bank, so they will always form a part of its accounts.

Central bank reserve currency is the money of the banking sector; it is the type of money that the central bank and regular banks use to do business and settle balances with each other. Notably, regular banks with an excess of reserves lend these out to regular banks with insufficient reserves.

These asset purchases are called open market operations (OMO). Typically, the most common asset purchased by the central bank is government debt. This shows the close relationship between central banks and central governments, as central banks create money to finance government activity.

The customers of regular banks can withdraw their deposits in the form of physical currency. To fulfill this obligation, regular banks request delivery of physical currency from the central bank, which delivers it and draws down the regular bank’s balance of central bank reserve currency in its account at the central bank by the equivalent amount. Therefore, physical currency and central bank reserve currency—together comprising base money—comprise the monetary reserves of regular banks.

Because the customers of regular banks don’t typically request the use of all of the money in their accounts at once, regular banks make loans with an eye on having enough reserves to satisfy the volume of withdrawals and other uses of money that their customers make, rather than having enough reserves to fully satisfy its own demand deposit accounts, that is, all money that customers could demand immediately. If the central bank creates new money and increases the reserves of a regular bank by purchasing an asset from it, the regular bank will, in turn, create even more new money by making loans far in excess of the amount of new reserves it receives. Regular banks and their customers do business with each other, so money is constantly being multiplied on top of reserves, since with each new deposit regular banks receive they will look to create new loans as well. This process is known as fractional-reserve banking, since regular bank reserves are only a small fraction of the deposit liabilities that they owe.

This core system of money creation represents an inverted pyramid. The central bank pyramids central bank reserve currency on top of its ability to create physical currency. The regular banks then pyramid demand deposit accounts on top of their stock of central bank reserve currency.

Other Monetary Policy Tools:

Reserve Requirements — The central bank has the legal regulatory power over the proportion of reserves that regular banks must keep. This power can affect monetary policy, with higher reserve requirements leading to a lower supply of money, and lower reserve requirements leading to a higher supply of money.

Deposit Insurance — The central bank guarantees the deposits of customers of regular banks up to a certain limit. The purpose of this tool is to attempt to prevent bank runs, where customers perceive that a regular bank is operating on a basis of insolvency, without enough reserves to meet their demand deposit obligations, and so the customers attempt to retrieve their money from the stock of reserves that the bank does possess. The central bank guaranteeing these accounts can give more stability to a system of fractional reserve banking, yet it also creates moral hazard.

Discount Window — The central bank has the power to lend central bank reserve currency to regular banks through the discount window. This was the main initial justification for the creation of central banks, to act as a “lender of last resort” to regular banks if they got in trouble. As such, the central bank typically sets the interest rate in this market higher than the rate regular banks will charge each other on loans of central bank reserve currency. This is to ensure its place as an emergency option.

Paying Interest on Reserves — A relatively recent addition to the central bank toolkit is the policy of paying interest on central bank reserve currency held by regular banks in accounts at the central bank. The purpose of this tool is to allow the central bank to purchase assets without a strong impact on price inflation or interest rates. The central bank creates new central bank reserve currency and injects it into the system, but as long as the central bank pays a higher interest rate on reserves held with it, than the rate regular banks earn by loaning reserves to one another, regular banks will deposit much of these new reserves at the central bank to earn this higher rate. This means regular banks are having less of a multiplying effect on the new money, and price inflation is consequently lower than it would otherwise be. Also, the central bank can affect the rate regular banks charge each other on loans of reserves by changing the rate that it pays on reserves parked at the central bank.

Types of Asset Purchased — The different types of asset purchased by the central bank will have different types of effects on monetary policy and the wider economy. All else being equal, the central bank purchasing gold will tend to bolster the credibility and stability of the national currency. The central bank purchasing more government debt will finance increased activity by the government. The central bank purchasing a specific class of assets from a firm will boost that firm itself, as well as the sector of the economy in which it operates.

The Repo Market — Repo refers in shorthand to repurchase agreements. These are a method of short-term financing, where a firm sells assets, typically government bonds, and agrees to repurchase them at a date in the near future for a slightly higher price. The price difference constitutes an interest rate as a function of time preference. The central bank intervenes in the repo market through open market operations and lending facilities, using central bank reserve currency. These interventions affect the supply of money, and consequently the interest rate in the repo market.

Conclusion

This article provides an overview of the modern system of banking and money creation. As an overview, I believe it to be accurate, but there is obviously more detail to the processes described above, and there are further tools employed by the central bank to create money and influence the wider banking system. There are also many problems with this system. For one, the ability to create money out of nothing and loan it out at interest requires the creation of more money down the line to repay the principal and interest. This is one of the concepts filed under the historically vague term of usury.

Thankfully, alternative ideas also exist that would avoid the problems of our present system. For a full discussion of the modern system of banking and money creation, its problems, and sound alternatives, I would recommend starting with Robert Murphy’s Understanding Money Mechanics. Another excellent text is Murray Rothbard’s The Case Against the Fed.

 


Originally Posted at https://mises.org/


Stay Updated with news.freeptomaineradio.com’s Daily Newsletter

Stay informed! Subscribe to our daily newsletter to receive updates on our latest blog posts directly in your inbox. Don’t let important information get buried by big tech.



Current subscribers:

Can You Understand the Fed’s Nearly $200 Billion in Losses?
Economics News philosophy Politics Science

Can You Understand the Fed’s Nearly $200 Billion in Losses?

 


Can you understand how it can be that the Federal Reserve, the world’s greatest and by far most important central bank, has now lost the astounding sum of $193 billion? If not, you are surely not alone. Since September 2022, the Fed has lost money every month. These unprecedented losses continue, and this fall they will in the aggregate pass $200 billion.

The Fed has a powerful mystique, which it works hard at cultivating. It intensely wants to be credible—that is, for you to believe in it (“credo” = I believe), and perhaps you do. The people’s belief is an important source of the Fed’s power, and its power is a key source of the government’s power. We can accurately say that the Fed prints power by printing money. The Fed does not want little things like $200 billion in losses to shake your belief—like the Wizard of Oz, it tells you, “Pay no attention to that man, or those losses, behind the curtain!” It puts its losses behind an accounting curtain that pretends that losses are an asset.

These operating losses are not, as is sometimes mistakenly said, mere “paper” losses. They are real, cash losses. The Fed is suffering negative net interest income because its cost of funds is much greater than the income on its investments. The $193 billion in operating losses exceeds the Fed’s $43 billion in total capital by more than four times. Thus at present, it has no earnings, no retained earnings, and no capital. In addition to that, it had a mark to market loss of over $1 trillion as of its June 30 financial statements.

How can this be? How can the bank with the hugely profitable monopoly of issuing the world’s dominant reserve currency, be losing a fortune?

To understand the Fed, or any central bank, you have to divide it analytically into two different parts, and account for the functions and the profits of the two parts separately. The Fed does not do this, although the logic is classic and was already required for the Bank of England by the Bank Charter Act of 1844, also called “Peel’s Bank Act,” after Sir Robert Peel, the Prime Minister who promoted it. The Bank of England was at that point the greatest and by far the most important central bank in the world.

The Bank of England was divided by Peel’s Act into an Issue Department and a Banking Department. The idea at the time was to tie the paper currency firmly to gold. That has disappeared in both theory and practice, but the Bank of England still keeps its books according to this fundamental division of functions. So should the Fed.

The Issue Function of the Fed exploits its government-granted monopoly of issuing the U.S. currency. Its liabilities are the $2.3 trillion in currency outstanding, the paper dollars held not only in the U.S., but all over the world. From a profitability point of view, these are wonderful liabilities for the central bank. The currency is a non-interest bearing, perpetual, non-redeemable source of funds.

The Issue Function’s assets are the $2.3 trillion in investments financed by the currency issued. These investments are typically government bonds.

Why is issuing currency so profitable? If in 2023, the Issue Function of the Fed had used its $2.3 trillion simply to buy Treasury bills, it would have received about a 5% yield. The result would have been interest expense = zero and interest income = $115 billion. If operating expenses were $1 billion (a guess), the net profit would have been $114 billion. But it looks like the Issue Function unwisely, or perhaps foolishly, invested its funds in long-term bonds at 2%, at the bottom of interest rates. Even so, it still had a profit of $45 billion in 2023.

The Federal Reserve as a whole lost $114 billion in 2023, the profits of the Issue Function notwithstanding. That means that the Banking Function—i.e. the rest of the Fed, with its QE investments, mortgage securities, deposits, loans, expenses, and a lot of risk—actually lost the $114 billion plus the entire $45 billion profit from the Issue Function’s currency monopoly. Thus the Fed’s Banking Function for 2023 lost $159 billion–and that’s only for one year. For the two years ending this September 30, I estimate the Fed’s Banking Function will have lost about $290 billion. Quite a number, and the losses continue.

The Fed should adopt the two-department approach to help the Congress and the public understand what it is doing, with a hat tip to Sir Robert Peel.

Originally published in the New York Sun. Reprinted with the author’s permission. 

 


Originally Posted at https://mises.org/


Stay Updated with news.freeptomaineradio.com’s Daily Newsletter

Stay informed! Subscribe to our daily newsletter to receive updates on our latest blog posts directly in your inbox. Don’t let important information get buried by big tech.



Current subscribers: