The Age of Confusion
Talks with Professor Clancy. Human History: Palaeolithic, Mesolithic, Neolithic (stone age), Bronze Age, Iron Age, Dark Ages, Middle Ages, Enlightenment, Age of Confusion.
– YouTube
Compelling evidence that excessive synthetic foreign DNA encapsulated in lipid nanoparticles
Mr. Russell Broadbent, MP
https://russellbroadbent.com.au
Letter to Anthony Albanese, Australian Prime Minister
https://russellbroadbent.com.au/australiansdemandanswers/
In short, there is compelling evidence that excessive synthetic foreign DNA encapsulated in lipid nanoparticles can integrate into human cells, potentially leading to genomic instability, cancers, immune system disruption, and adverse hereditary effects.
https://russellbroadbent.com.au/australians-deserve-answers/
Report from Canadian virologist, Dr. David Speicher
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/sb20elb520v6a1saxg9lj/240909-D-Speicher-Report.pdf?rlkey=dutcvd85gh80ebfs2ucdmorba&e=3&st=0jpsw84f&dl=0
Background
Previous work in Canada, showed that the Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 modRNA vaccines contained residual plasmid DNA,
when the vaccine vials were tested by fluorometry the total DNA levels greatly exceeded the regulatory limit by 7 to 145-fold.
The Pfizer COVID-19 modRNA vaccines also contained an SV40 promoter
(SV40 is a DNA sequence that sometimes causes tumours in animals, but most often persists as a latent infection)
Not initially disclosed to the National Regulatory Agencies, namely the USA FDA, Health Canada the European Medicines Agency, and the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) in Australia.
Conclusions
Despite the extremely high DNA loads the results were repeatable suggesting the result is true and valid.
The total DNA concentration in all Australian vials when tested by Qubit® fluorometry,
far exceeded the TGA 10 ng DNA/dose guidance with Moderna having the highest total DNA levels.
https://www.nhs.uk/vaccinations/COVID-19-vaccine/
Prime Minister urged to 'immediately suspend' mRNA injections
https://blog.maryannedemasi.com/p/prime-minister-urged-to-immediately?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=1044435&post_id=149704180&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=1khidx&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email
Important letter to PM
Mr. Russell Broadbent, MP
https://russellbroadbent.com.au
Letter to Anthony Albanese, Australian Prime Minister
https://russellbroadbent.com.au/australiansdemandanswers/
The Hon Anthony Albanese MP Prime Minister
Parliament House
CANBERRA ACT 2600
By email: parliament@pm.gov.au Dear Prime Minister
I refer to my letter of 20 September 2024 calling on the government to immediately suspend the use of Pfizer and Moderna Covid-19 products due to the evidence of significant synthetic DNA contamination, as detailed in Dr. David Speicher’s report.
Unlike the Thalidomide tragedy, which resulted in over 10,000 victims globally, the Covid-19 vaccines have been administered to more than 20 million Australians, totalling over 63 million doses. The contamination detected in these vaccines, if not addressed, presents a substantial risk, with the potential for these dangers – such as genomic integration and potential long-term health impacts – to multiply with each additional dose administered. Immediate action through a suspension of these products is critical to mitigate further risk.
To assist in adopting a precautionary approach and minimizing further harm, I enclose a Science Summary created and endorsed by eminent Australian and international scientists and medical experts. The summary reinforces the known and potential dangers of DNA contamination and highlights the need for an urgent and independent investigation. As advised by the co-signatories, the Department of Health and Aged Care has produced no evidence to demonstrate why the detected DNA contamination will not produce the dire adverse health outcomes detailed in the Science Summary.
Additionally, I have reason to believe that multiple attempts by prominent scientists to warn the TGA of these risks have been disregarded since early 2021, raising serious questions about the agency's ability to protect the health and well-being of Australians.
Finally, I draw your attention to the Biosecurity Act 2015, which may now be relevant. Given the contamination evidence, I recommend the Minister for Agriculture initiate a Biosecurity Import Risk Analysis of these products, potentially leading to the suspension of these products due to the risks they pose to human health.
I gratefully acknowledge the assistance of the 52 co-signatories below in the preparation of this letter and reiterate my call seeking your urgent action to ensure the safety of all Australians.
Yours sincerely
Russell Broadbent MP Member for Monash
Changing views
Changing Views toward mRNA based Covid Vaccines in the Scientific Literature: 2020 – 2024
http://www.paom.pl
http://www.paom.pl/Changing-Views-toward-mRNA-based-Covid-Vaccines-in-the-Scientific-Literature-2020,189961,0,2.html
Before the global Covid-19 pandemic
mRNA based vaccines had never been administered to the public,
(outside of a single clinical trial that was not completed at the time.)
The aim of this article is to raise awareness that medical science can be biased due to social and economic influences,
especially during high stress epochs in history.
Scientists should be conscious of always being objective and sceptical regardless of what is happening in the wider world.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33332359/
Material and methods
A literature survey was performed examining the reporting of severe adverse events (SAEs) in articles published between 2020 and 2024.
4,130 articles
Results and discussion
From 2020 to 2024,
the literature has gone from claiming there are absolutely no SAEs from mRNA based vaccines (2020/2021),
to an acknowledgment of a significant number of various SAEs (2023/2024).
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38350768/
Conclusions
The early scientific literature was biased,
so as not to report SAEs,
due to social and political concerns,
and overwhelming corporate greed.
Only in the last year have scientists been able to publish articles that acknowledge a high number of SAEs linked to mRNA based vaccines.
This should act as a warning that science should be completely objective when evaluating health risks,
but can often be influenced by social and economic considerations.
More detail
International competition between the United States, Russia and China
All three countries claiming their vaccine was the most effective and the safest.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32663910/
For unknown reasons, the United States chose to invest heavily into mRNA based vaccines,
as opposed to other types of vaccines with stronger research supporting the underlying technology.
Due to competition between the world’s three super-powers, no country wanted to admit there were any problems with their nation’s vaccination program.
Unfortunately, these toxic politics entered into the scientific literature en force.
Three time periods, 2020 to April 2024
2020 to the end of 2021
Scientific literature claimed there were absolutely no serious adverse events (SAEs) whatsoever
January to August 2022
Scientific literature claimed there were some SAEs,
but they were very rare and that mRNA vaccines were a miracle drug
September 2022 to April 2024
Characterized as being highly sceptical of mRNA based vaccines.
E.g. COVID-19 vaccines and adverse events of special interest: A multinational Global Vaccine Data Network (GVDN) cohort study of 99 million vaccinated individuals
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38350768/
Significant OE ratios were found for Guillain–Barré syndrome, cerebral venous sinus thrombosis, acute disseminated encephalomyelitis, myocarditis and pericarditis.
Conclusions
A drastic shift in the medical literature occurred concerning mRNA based vaccines between 2020 and 2024.
The early literature seems to have been heavily biased in favour of promoting an experimental vaccine,
without any previously completed human clinical trials,
for both monetary and political purposes.
Even as reports of SAEs became too numerous to dismiss in 2022, the literature at the time simply down played SAEs as extremely rare.
Even though there were blatantly obvious conflicts of interest, such as vaccine producers publishing manuscripts promoting their own vaccine, articles were published in very prestigious journals.
It wasn’t until late 2022 that the first criticisms of mRNA vaccines began to appear and, as time goes by, more articles are becoming more vocal about completely banning all mRNA vaccines until they can be thoroughly tested for safety concerns.
The drastic shift in attitude towards mRNA vaccines in only about three years shows serious vulnerabilities in Western medical research.
Health catastrophe with Dr. Dhand
Link for the full film, https://cerealkillers.gumroad.com/l/nopharmfilm/drjohn
Th First do no Pharm
This is film isn't just an exposé – it's a call to arms. It will provide you with the knowledge and tools to fight back against a system that values profits over patients.
We'll show you how to navigate this treacherous landscape, how to protect yourself and your loved ones from the excesses of an industry gone mad.
Moderna fine
Moderna, 'inappropriate financial inducement', brought 'discredit upon the pharmaceutical industry'.
Moderna under fire after children offered cash to test Covid vaccine
Company targeted 12 to 18 year-olds through WhatsApp with payments of £1,500
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/10/02/moderna-offered-children-cash-test-covid-vaccine/
Moderna has been rebuked by regulators
Moderna ordered to pay £14,000
(Moderna, total revenue was $6.8 billion in 2023)
Moderna representative had sent a WhatsApp message offering £1,500 to children to be subjects in covid booster trials.
NextCove trial
The offer was made by a paediatrician from an unnamed NHS trust
UK Prescription Medicines Code of Practice Authority (PMCPA)
https://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/completed-cases/auth3886324-a-complaint-on-behalf-of-children-s-covid-vaccines-advisory-council-v-moderna/
Ruled that the offer amounted to “inappropriate financial inducement”,
found the company had brought “discredit upon the pharmaceutical industry”.
UK Prescription Medicines Code of Practice Authority
https://www.pmcpa.org.uk
https://www.pmcpa.org.uk/about-us/
https://www.abpi.org.uk
A research ethics committee
Warned about the “large amount of money” that Moderna was offering,
voiced concern it was “much higher than would be considered a reasonable reimbursement”.
The Medicines for Human Use (Clinical Trials) Regulations (2004)
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2004/1031/contents
It is prohibited for incentives or financial inducements to be given to children or their parents.
Complaint was filed in the UK
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/moderna-blamed-after-children-offered-1-500-to-take-part-in-covid-19-trial/ar-AA1rhn4y
On behalf of the Children’s Covid Vaccines Advisory Council
https://childrensunion.org/ccvac/
In a statement, the PMCPA ruled
“On balance, the panel considered that this brought discredit upon and reduced confidence in the pharmaceutical industry.”
Moderna must provide a written undertaking that the practice will “cease forthwith” and pay for administrative costs.
Esther McVey MP
(formerly of the APPG on Covid-19 vaccine damage)
“A charge of £14,000 to a company that enjoyed a total revenue of $6.8 billion in 2023 is hardly likely to make them think twice before breaking the rules again.
“Not only are the charges too small but when they come, they come too late. There is a major backlog in handling these kinds of complaints, with a recent case against Moderna taking the PMCPA 18 months to consider.
“The system is clearly broken and failing to keep patients safe from misleading information and advertising about medicines.
The public’s trust in healthcare authorities will only continue to be damaged unless meaningful action is taken.”
Corporate interests vs the public’s right to know
By Rt Hon Esther McVey
It is time for real transparency in clinical research.
The case details the company’s inappropriate and unacceptable use of social media and big financial incentives to recruit healthy children into its Covid-19 vaccine trial.
For me, this case prompts further questions about how and why Moderna’s NextCOVE trial was ever approved in the first place.
Human experiments
With Dr. Clare Craig, diagnostic pathologist and medical researcher. Dr. Craig on SubStack, https://drclarecraig.substack.com
COVID, the untold story. So much more makes sense after this book and my first illuminating discussion with Dr. Craig. Get your copy in the UK here:
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Expired-untold-Dr-Clare-Craig/dp/1739344707
For friends in the US get your copy here, https://www.amazon.com/Expired-untold-Dr-Clare-Craig/dp/1739344707
Great discussion
Link for the full film, https://cerealkillers.gumroad.com/l/nopharmfilm/drjohn
Th First do no Pharm
This is film isn't just an exposé – it's a call to arms. It will provide you with the knowledge and tools to fight back against a system that values profits over patients.
We'll show you how to navigate this treacherous landscape, how to protect yourself and your loved ones from the excesses of an industry gone mad.
Your blood clot data
Scan the QR code or click this link for the peoples survey, https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/2024PeoplesBloodClotSurvey