- Click here to visit Dr. John Campbell’s Youtube Channel
- LinkedIn profile
- Twitter Or X Account
- Facebook page
US Interior Secretary Doug Burgum on Thursday announced measures aimed at expanding oil and gas development across Alaska’s federal lands, fulfilling one of President Donald Trump’s key pledges. The initiatives implement one of Trump’s day one executive orders: “Unleashing Alaska’s Extraordinary Resource Potential.” This directed the Interior Department to rescind environmental protections ordered under previous […]
The post Trump admin moves to expand energy projects in Alaska appeared first on Insider Paper.
Escobar: A Hard Rain’s A-Gonna Fall… From The West Down To The East
Authored by Pepe Escobar,
Let’s start with that phone call. The Kremlin readout is quite sober – but it does reveal a few nuggets. There is no comprehensive deal – yet – between Moscow and Washington. Far from it: we are just in the initial tentative stage of talking and talking about several interconnected dossiers.
President Putin gave absolutely nothing away. The agreed-upon pause on attacks on energy infrastructure – not energy and (italics mine) infrastructure – spells out as Putin imposing a stop on dangerous Ukrainian hits on the Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant.
That may be lost among all the Western hysteria; but there are two absolute conditions expressed by Moscow for anything in this riddle to start complying with objective reality – and not muddle along as a reality show narrative trainwreck:
1.“The settlement in Ukraine must take into account the unconditional need to eliminate the root causes of the crisis, Russia’s legitimate security interests.”
2.“The key condition for preventing the escalation of the conflict should be a complete cessation of foreign military aid and the provision of intelligence information to Kiev.”
US special envoy Witkoff is spinning that ceasefire “details” will be ironed out on Sunday in Saudi Arabia. No matter the amount of shrieking, Kiev will have to accept it.
Putin-Trump did not spend over 2 hours just talking hockey, hazy Black Sea navigation prospects and a quite limited energy infrastructure missile strike one-month pause.
In this incandescent juncture, what matters is off the record. And that might as well have been Iran. And the prospect of serious Hard Rain fallin’.
I’ve stepped in the middle of seven sad forestsI’ve been out in front of a dozen dead oceansI’ve been ten thousand miles in the mouth of a graveyard
A certain psychopathological entity in West Asia is obsessed to ram all its opponents through the mouth of a graveyard. Putin must have had the chance to explain to Trump that Russia respects the UN Charter and abides by international law. Russia and Iran – top BRICS members – signed a comprehensive strategic partnership last January in Moscow. Russia provides detailed ISR/air defense/EW intel to Tehran.
A proverbially hysterical narrative now imprints the notion that Tel Aviv – courting Trump 2.0 backing – is ready to inflict airstrikes on Iran to “prevent it from going nuclear”. Tehran, as detailed by Ayatollah Khamenei, has no interest whatsoever in building a nuclear weapon.
There’s no way Russia will allow Israel – with crucial American backing – to wreak havoc on Iran. Even as Tehran is already capable to react to any attack, with devastating consequences. Without nuclear weapons – and even without Russian direct help.
Operation True Promise 2 – True Promise 3 is still on hold – had already demonstrated that Israel is absolutely defenseless against wave after wave of sophisticated Iranian missiles. Were the US under Trump 2.0 to be involved in a direct attack, all US military bases in West Asia would be incinerated, plus severe punishment to vassals hosting these bases. End result: oil…
On Thursday’s “Alex Marlow Show,” host and Breitbart Editor-in-Chief Alex Marlow talked about his conversation with President Donald Trump. Marlow said, “[H]e is still very shocked, I think, by the way he was treated in between his two administrations with the
The post Alex Marlow: The Left’s Lawfare Is ‘Top of Mind’ for Trump as an ‘Existential Threat’ to the MAGA Agenda appeared first on Breitbart.
MSNBC Anchors Forced To Correct Themselves In False Tulsi Gabbard Claim
Authored by Luis Cornelio via Headline USA,
Two MSNBC hosts were forced to eat their own words on Tuesday after blindly repeating a now-retracted AP report about Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard supposedly referring to President Donald Trump and Russian leader Vladimir Putin as “very good friends.”
MSNBC set the record straight last night and corrected false reporting about DNI Tulsi Gabbard. pic.twitter.com/b7MZEW1zwj
— Alex Pfeiffer (@Pfeiffer47) March 19, 2025
The AP had to walk back its demonstrably false report, as it was revealed Gabbard had been talking about Trump and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi.
Ali Velshi and Stephanie Ruhle, the insufferable anchors of The Last Word and 11th Hour, respectively, were left scrambling after parroting the AP’s debunked claim in a desperate attempt to smear the Trump administration.
As reported by the Daily Caller, Velshi said his show had “reported on excerpts of an interview between the Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, and an Indian TV news network in which she said that Trump was good friends with the world leader.”
He added, “Now we said that world leader was Vladimir Putin, but the full interview was subsequently released and it showed that Gabbard was referring to Donald Trump and the Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi.”
Ruhle echoed Velshi’s retraction nearly verbatim, which was likely written by attorneys to avoid legal repercussions.
“Last night, we reported on excerpts of an interview between the Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard and an Indian TV news network in which she said that Trump was good friends with a world leader,” Ruhle said, according to the Caller.
“Now we said that world leader was Vladimir Putin, but the full interview shows that Gabbard was referring to Trump and Indian Prime Minister Modi. We cleared that up,” she admitted.
The AP itself issued a press statement retracting its false claim:
“The Associated Press has withdrawn its story about U.S. Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard saying President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin ‘are very good friends.’ Gabbard was talking about Trump and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi. The AP will publish a corrected version of the story.”
Alexa Henning, Gabbard’s spokesperson and seasoned Republican communicator, minced no words in response to the AP, scolding their reporting as “total trash.”
“This is why no one trusts the maliciously incompetent and purposefully bias media,” Henning said.
“If this isn’t a clear example of pushing a solely political narrative, then nothing is.”
Trump on banning the AP from the Oval Office & Air Force One:
“That’s the way life works. Thank you for the question.” pic.twitter.com/U9tSEe0pCP
— Breaking911 (@Breaking911) February 18, 2025
The AP scandal comes just weeks after Trump revoked the news outlet’s special access to the Oval Office, citing their misleading and false reporting.
Tyler Durden
Thu, 03/20/2025 – 17:40…
“It’s because of wealth transfer.”
Attorney General Pam Bondi on Thursday announced charges against individuals participating in what she described as “domestic terrorism against Tesla properties.”
The post Pam Bondi Announces Charges Against Individuals Participating in ‘Domestic Terrorism Against Tesla Properties’ appeared first on Breitbart.
“All citizens of Ireland to have a voice and a choice on their future! Vote McGregor and have your voice heard!”
US Attorney General Pam Bondi said Thursday in the latest public show of support for Elon Musk, a top ally of President Donald Trump, that serious charges are being brought against three people accused of targeting Tesla cars. “Let this be a warning: if you join this wave of domestic terrorism against Tesla properties, the […]
The post Tesla vandals will end up ‘behind bars’: attorney general appeared first on Insider Paper.
Earlier this month, Vance faced backlash after minimizing Britain’s military role, saying it was a “random country” that had not “fought a war in 30 or 40 years.”