Nolte: Slow-Walking Aid to Hurricane-Ravaged Red America Is All Upside for Kamala

Nolte: Slow-Walking Aid to Hurricane-Ravaged Red America Is All Upside for Kamala

You don’t think those same people are capable of leaving a bunch of people they see as deplorable, ignorant, gun-and-Bible-clinging, redneck hillbillies without power for a few weeks if it increases the odds of winning a swing state?

The post Nolte: Slow-Walking Aid to Hurricane-Ravaged Red America Is All Upside for Kamala appeared first on Breitbart.

Read More
Tropic Trouble Brewing In Gulf Of Mexico Could "Slingshot" Towards Offshore Oil Rigs 

Tropic Trouble Brewing In Gulf Of Mexico Could “Slingshot” Towards Offshore Oil Rigs 

Tropic Trouble Brewing In Gulf Of Mexico Could “Slingshot” Towards Offshore Oil Rigs 

The latest Tropical Outlook from the National Hurricane Center indicates a 70% probability of tropical cyclone formation in the Gulf of Mexico or the Caribbean Sea over the next seven days. Forecast models predict that a tropical storm could develop early next week, potentially making landfall along the Gulf Coast—the location of America’s top offshore oil/gas rigs and refineries on the mainland—by late next week. 

“Northwestern Caribbean Sea and Gulf of Mexico: Disorganized showers and thunderstorms located over the western Caribbean Sea and portions of Central America are associated with a very broad area of low pressure. Environmental conditions appear favorable for gradual development of this system during the next several days. A tropical depression is likely to form while the system moves slowly northward across the northwestern Caribbean Sea and Gulf of Mexico through the end of the week,” NHC wrote in an update on Sunday morning. 

Since Thursday, we have been monitoring potential tropical development via various weather models because this potential storm threatens US oil/gas infrastructure. 

The Weather Channel’s Jim Cantore wrote on X, “One of the things to consider with this week’s pending tropical threat is where the “slingshot” sets up.  The slingshot is the upper low (blue) that could ventilate the system first and aid in intensification, then slingshot it into the coast.  The stronger it is at landfall the deeper inland  the more intense parts of it get.  Guidance has much to sort out with all the players coming together.  We should have an invest soon as NHC has issued a 10% area in 48hrs and marked a starting point.”

Washington Post’s Matthew Cappucci wrote on X that a hurricane will likely form in the Gulf of Mexico…  

“Mike’s Weather PageOvernight GFS/EURO ensembles on http://weathernerds.org. Huge consistency. EURO catching up to the GFS. Timing here Friday. Many already make landfall by then. Getting real Florida IMO,” Mike’s Weather Page wrote on X. 

Landfall in Florida, Georgia, Alabama, Mississippi and or Louisiana 

About 15% of the nation’s total crude production capacity via offshore rigs is in the cone uncertainty. Also, about 45% of the US refining capacity resides at major refineries in Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Alabama. Via Bloomberg data…

There’s a high probability the forecast could can change in the next five days. 

Tyler Durden
Sun, 09/22/2024 – 16:55

Read More
What You Do Now Can Affect Your Brain For 2 Weeks

What You Do Now Can Affect Your Brain For 2 Weeks

What You Do Now Can Affect Your Brain For 2 Weeks

Authored by Huey Freeman via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

New research shows that our daily exercise and sleep habits can affect brain function for up to two weeks.

Our brains do not react to things in quick, isolated surges; instead, brain activity evolves over more extended periods.

Rennyks/Shutterstock

“This suggests that even a workout or a restless night from last week could still affect your brain—and therefore your attention, cognition and memory—well into next week,” according to the study’s press release.

Physical activity, sleep patterns, heart rate changes, and even subtle mood shifts can imprint on our neural networks for up to two weeks. This revelation challenges conventional wisdom about brain function and opens new avenues for understanding cognition, memory, and mental health treatment.

Researcher Becomes the Study Subject

Ana Triana, a doctoral candidate at Aalto University in Espoo, Finland, performed double duty as the study subject, tracking her own activities while serving as the research team leader. Brain scans, smartphones, and wearable devices recorded her daily life and brain activities.

This experiment was designed to challenge the conventional wisdom that “just a few trials are sufficient for correctly sampling an individual’s brain activity and behavior,” the researchers wrote in their study, published Tuesday in the Public Library of Science (P

Triana emphasized the importance of continuous monitoring through wearable technology, noting that traditional brain scans, conducted while a person rests for 30 minutes twice weekly, offer limited insights.

We wanted to go beyond isolated events,” Triana said in the press release.

“Our behaviour and mental states are constantly shaped by our environment and experiences. Yet, we know little about the response of brain … on different timescales, from days to months.”

The researchers hope their unique study will help improve mental health treatment, focusing on individual information on the brain and a person’s daily life.

Our approach gives context to neuroscience and delivers very fine detail to our understanding of the brain,” Dr. Nick Hayward, a physician, a neuroscientist, and study co-author, said in the press release. He added that information from daily life should be examined in a lab “to see the full picture of how our habits shape the brain.”

Read the rest here…

Tyler Durden
Sat, 10/12/2024 – 22:45

Read More
- YouTube

Changing views

Changing Views toward mRNA based Covid Vaccines in the Scientific Literature: 2020 – 2024

http://www.paom.pl

http://www.paom.pl/Changing-Views-toward-mRNA-based-Covid-Vaccines-in-the-Scientific-Literature-2020,189961,0,2.html

Before the global Covid-19 pandemic

mRNA based vaccines had never been administered to the public,

(outside of a single clinical trial that was not completed at the time.)

The aim of this article is to raise awareness that medical science can be biased due to social and economic influences,

especially during high stress epochs in history.

Scientists should be conscious of always being objective and sceptical regardless of what is happening in the wider world.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33332359/
Material and methods

A literature survey was performed examining the reporting of severe adverse events (SAEs) in articles published between 2020 and 2024.

4,130 articles

Results and discussion

From 2020 to 2024,

the literature has gone from claiming there are absolutely no SAEs from mRNA based vaccines (2020/2021),

to an acknowledgment of a significant number of various SAEs (2023/2024).

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38350768/

Conclusions

The early scientific literature was biased,

so as not to report SAEs,

due to social and political concerns,

and overwhelming corporate greed.

Only in the last year have scientists been able to publish articles that acknowledge a high number of SAEs linked to mRNA based vaccines.

This should act as a warning that science should be completely objective when evaluating health risks,

but can often be influenced by social and economic considerations.

More detail

International competition between the United States, Russia and China

All three countries claiming their vaccine was the most effective and the safest.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32663910/

For unknown reasons, the United States chose to invest heavily into mRNA based vaccines,

as opposed to other types of vaccines with stronger research supporting the underlying technology.

Due to competition between the world’s three super-powers, no country wanted to admit there were any problems with their nation’s vaccination program.

Unfortunately, these toxic politics entered into the scientific literature en force.

Three time periods, 2020 to April 2024

2020 to the end of 2021

Scientific literature claimed there were absolutely no serious adverse events (SAEs) whatsoever

January to August 2022

Scientific literature claimed there were some SAEs,

but they were very rare and that mRNA vaccines were a miracle drug

September 2022 to April 2024

Characterized as being highly sceptical of mRNA based vaccines.

E.g. COVID-19 vaccines and adverse events of special interest: A multinational Global Vaccine Data Network (GVDN) cohort study of 99 million vaccinated individuals

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38350768/

Significant OE ratios were found for Guillain–Barré syndrome, cerebral venous sinus thrombosis, acute disseminated encephalomyelitis, myocarditis and pericarditis.

Conclusions

A drastic shift in the medical literature occurred concerning mRNA based vaccines between 2020 and 2024.

The early literature seems to have been heavily biased in favour of promoting an experimental vaccine,

without any previously completed human clinical trials,

for both monetary and political purposes.

Even as reports of SAEs became too numerous to dismiss in 2022, the literature at the time simply down played SAEs as extremely rare.

Even though there were blatantly obvious conflicts of interest, such as vaccine producers publishing manuscripts promoting their own vaccine, articles were published in very prestigious journals.

It wasn’t until late 2022 that the first criticisms of mRNA vaccines began to appear and, as time goes by, more articles are becoming more vocal about completely banning all mRNA vaccines until they can be thoroughly tested for safety concerns.

The drastic shift in attitude towards mRNA vaccines in only about three years shows serious vulnerabilities in Western medical research.

Read More